Seasider9601 wrote:We can't afford to lose any more surely....
paulshrimp wrote:Could someone clear something up for me please? Do Morecambe have a paid employee who deals with communications, OWS etc. or do we rely on volunteers? If the answer is the former then the lack of news about virtually everything is an absolute disgrace. It's no fun being a mushroom!
marky No.1 wrote:No news is good news, isn't it
Loyalsupporter wrote:Miller has joined Carlisle
Freez wrote:From what we can gather, both offered reduced contracts, so expecting them to drive up from Staffs for less money???
Cant blame either of them if true!!
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Freez wrote:From what we can gather, both offered reduced contracts, so expecting them to drive up from Staffs for less money???
Cant blame either of them if true!!
How on earth have we managed to lure Accrington's best defender if that is the case.
halftimeresults wrote:it's funny.
marky No.1 wrote:Maybe thought his team mates include the player with loads of assists and another who scores lots of goals
halftimeresults wrote:it's funny that fans of other teams keep saying "keep the faith" but this is really hard to take.
MFC-Manc wrote:I was hoping they both could have waited till the takeover and negotiated contracts. To lose your 2 best players must reduce the price of the club.
I'm gutted they have both gone and Carlisle have signed 2 excellent players for free.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:MFC-Manc wrote:I was hoping they both could have waited till the takeover and negotiated contracts. To lose your 2 best players must reduce the price of the club.
I'm gutted they have both gone and Carlisle have signed 2 excellent players for free.
Disappointing but won't affect the price or value of the club.
An out of contract player over 23 years old has no value.
If the takeover happens the club may be able to sign similar calibre players.
parceldave wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:MFC-Manc wrote:I was hoping they both could have waited till the takeover and negotiated contracts. To lose your 2 best players must reduce the price of the club.
I'm gutted they have both gone and Carlisle have signed 2 excellent players for free.
Disappointing but won't affect the price or value of the club.
An out of contract player over 23 years old has no value.
If the takeover happens the club may be able to sign similar calibre players.
If a takeover was pending then surely the new owners would have tried to keep our potentially best two assets and offer them improved contracts rather than reduced ones as we are led to believe, and i cannot see how we can attract players of a similar calibre on a relatively low salary.
Would be interesting to know at what stage if any the takeover talks are at , maybe Ken H can enlighten us on how long these things take or is there any way of checking i.e if any potential buyer has to state publicly that they have shown an interest or would it show up on a credit check etc .
George Dawes wrote:... Yes , Miller wasnt an automatic choice anyway, Jim did pick others infront of him, despite scoring goals.
And that would have baffled him aswell as Fans, so Carlisle was a no brainer.
but this is what a lot of the on the field problems are down to.black morse wrote:George Dawes wrote:... Yes , Miller wasnt an automatic choice anyway, Jim did pick others infront of him, despite scoring goals.
And that would have baffled him aswell as Fans, so Carlisle was a no brainer.
Can't believe that Jim doesn't talk to his players and explain the reasons for leaving them out or playing them as impact subs and it must go farther than a short..."because I say so!"
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests