Ok some suspect it's a way to get the ground for future development after 2 years.
But could it be that they are genuine and that they chose our club because they wouldn't have to invest in building a new stadium. There are claims that they were approached by 2 other clubs but it may be that those club's are in need of new stadiums.Thecost of new stadia would make their investment in our club more logical.
I do have concerns like everybody else. Why invest so much when the return on investment will small if anything at all, which then lends credence to those who expressed concern aboutthe ground after 2 years.
If and I'll admit it's a big if their ambitions for our club are honourable would those who have questioned their sincerity be big enough to say they got it wrong. For my part I'd have no problem saying that I was wrong to appear to support the takeover,.