https://www.espn.co.uk/football/story/_ ... adline-day
What a shame.....
Keith wrote:Really not got this "[b]O/T" thing worked out? [/b]
He did a Stockton at the start of the season by "making himself unavailable" because he wanted a transfer (so, a bit of a twat?) Harrogate have already spent some of the transfer fee, to replace their striking-striker. It will be interesting to know who pays his wages etc from now, if Harrogate don't want him? Will Wrexham be paying his wages without being able to play him?
redrobo wrote:Keith wrote:Really not got this "[b]O/T" thing worked out? [/b]
He did a Stockton at the start of the season by "making himself unavailable" because he wanted a transfer (so, a bit of a twat?) Harrogate have already spent some of the transfer fee, to replace their striking-striker. It will be interesting to know who pays his wages etc from now, if Harrogate don't want him? Will Wrexham be paying his wages without being able to play him?
CORRECTED.....
redrobo wrote:Wrexham are to appeal about the decision....will be interesting to see if they are successful.
Could open a whole new minefield if they are successful as other clubs will quote this case as being similar to their own situation.
black morse wrote:It's no laughing matter RR
Keith wrote:black morse wrote:It's no laughing matter RR
We let him off, 'cause he's a bit old now...
...mind you, what his excuse was a decade or more ago...
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 73 guests