Redalert1970 wrote:The thing is John as been charged on 251 offences not just 1
Redalert1970 wrote:Right decision for all concerned
redrobo wrote:Redalert1970 wrote:Right decision for all concerned
Surely a temporary club suspension and 'gardening leave' until it's all sorted would have been sufficient at this stage rather than an immediate loss of employment.....
redrobo wrote:Redalert1970 wrote:Right decision for all concerned
Surely a temporary club suspension and 'gardening leave' until it's all sorted would have been sufficient at this stage rather than an immediate loss of employment.....
Redalert1970 wrote:Sorry but John is not a young kid
He must have known what he was doing was wrong
Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Redalert1970 wrote:Sorry but John is not a young kid
He must have known what he was doing was wrong
Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this
Well let's hope the players/former players didn't know.
We don't know the nature of the bets but the only people who can affect football matches are players.
Relapsed_Shrimp wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:Redalert1970 wrote:Sorry but John is not a young kid
He must have known what he was doing was wrong
Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this
Well let's hope the players/former players didn't know.
We don't know the nature of the bets but the only people who can affect football matches are players.
Really? Only the players?
Users browsing this forum: Billy bodger, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 105 guests