Knightrider wrote:The area of the land is substantially greater than the land at Christie Park sold to Sainsbury's which I have read on this forum was purchased for 9 million pounds.
Westgate Wanderer wrote:It was purchased for £8 million! Overall building cost estimated £12 million
said £8 million on the notes at the agm the following yearAndy D wrote:Knightrider wrote:The area of the land is substantially greater than the land at Christie Park sold to Sainsbury's which I have read on this forum was purchased for 9 million pounds.Westgate Wanderer wrote:It was purchased for £8 million! Overall building cost estimated £12 million
i stand to be corrected but its never been officially confirmed what Sainsbury's paid for CP.
Thing is we all get told conflicting storys off Staff and Board Members or ex Board Members who say their in the know with the rumoured figure.
Last i got told was 10 million plus, i nearly chocked on my food, and asked are you sure because thought it was 8 million? told different, " AGAIN".
So its all rumours.
Knightrider wrote:Looks like Mr Gibson, former Secretary of the local Labour party has joined the round up gang. What Evelyn Archer told me about you Mike was interesting.
Westgate Wanderer wrote: said £8 million on the notes at the agm the following year
BHmfc wrote:I can't believe I'm joining in, but here goes. Knightrider, you state how the council sold the Westgate site to MFC on the cheap, but in all honesty it was an area of swamp land surrounded by drainage channels to stop the area from flooding every time it rained. Westgate Wanderers did their best to run youth teams on the pitches and they benefited when MFC paid for their relocation to an area which included NEW changing rooms and a hard surface car-park. Since their relocation hundreds of junior footballers,and their parents, have benefited from these much improved facilities. I would also like to state that as a council tax payer, I had no problem when the council sold this land to MFC, it was an eyesore and a real blot on the landscape. Think to what it was 10 years ago to what it is now. I personally believe that the council should support its local football team (as well as sports centres,parks,public spaces etc,etc) The benefit to Morecambe in having a football league team is massive, how can you put a value on all the free publicity that the town gets in the papers and on TV. Also what about the money that away supporters spend, quite a number will make a weekend visit, putting money into the local economy. It's points like this that are quite often overlooked, it's not just about the football club but the town as a whole.
BHmfc wrote:Westgate Wanderers did their best to run youth teams on the pitches and they benefited when MFC paid for their relocation to an area which included NEW changing rooms and a hard surface car-park. Since their relocation hundreds of junior footballers, and their parents, have benefited from these much improved facilities.
mrpotatohead wrote:Just remembered another ridiculous question from the knight....."Have the club considered paying the players performance related wages?"
BHmfc wrote:I can't believe I'm joining in, but here goes. Knightrider, you state how the council sold the Westgate site to MFC on the cheap, but in all honesty it was an area of swamp land surrounded by drainage channels to stop the area from flooding every time it rained. Westgate Wanderers did their best to run youth teams on the pitches and they benefited when MFC paid for their relocation to an area which included NEW changing rooms and a hard surface car-park. Since their relocation hundreds of junior footballers,and their parents, have benefited from these much improved facilities. I would also like to state that as a council tax payer, I had no problem when the council sold this land to MFC, it was an eyesore and a real blot on the landscape. Think to what it was 10 years ago to what it is now. I personally believe that the council should support its local football team (as well as sports centres,parks,public spaces etc,etc) The benefit to Morecambe in having a football league team is massive, how can you put a value on all the free publicity that the town gets in the papers and on TV. Also what about the money that away supporters spend, quite a number will make a weekend visit, putting money into the local economy. It's points like this that are quite often overlooked, it's not just about the football club but the town as a whole.
mrpotatohead wrote:Why are you persisting in lying about the fact that you aren't S Carey Williams, everybody can see through it, just come clean, your multiple personalities are actually identical anyway.
Posh wrote:Knightrider wrote:Looks like Mr Gibson, former Secretary of the local Labour party has joined the round up gang. What Evelyn Archer told me about you Mike was interesting.
Ahem. Former Chair of Lancaster Labour Party I’ll have you know. That was 16 years ago though. Your memory is fading. I guarantee Evelyn Archer had nothing of interest to say about me. Nothing that was true anyway. She lived in 1953 (aka Morecambe Standard Time).
Isn’t there some evidence you need to dig up about the American government being responsible for 9/11; the Earth being flat; or the Bermuda Triangle being responsible for Blobbygate?
Freez wrote:Please do some basic research, As a catagory 4 Academy, the club runs various youth sides against other football league clubs right through the 18/19 season, from ages 10 to 18.
This is a step up, not a step down.
Knightrider wrote:mrpotatohead wrote:Just remembered another ridiculous question from the knight....."Have the club considered paying the players performance related wages?"
Another misquote and misinforming readers who were not present PAL of a question asked by Mr Williams. I did not ask the question. His question was directed at Jimbo not the club.
He asked Jim if he thought a fair objective assessment of performance of individual players at matches relative to their monthly pay would improve performance and results, resulting in a higher league position and improved attendance by home fans at home games.
Andy D wrote:Knightrider wrote:mrpotatohead wrote:Just remembered another ridiculous question from the knight....."Have the club considered paying the players performance related wages?"
Another misquote and misinforming readers who were not present PAL of a question asked by Mr Williams. I did not ask the question. His question was directed at Jimbo not the club.
He asked Jim if he thought a fair objective assessment of performance of individual players at matches relative to their monthly pay would improve performance and results, resulting in a higher league position and improved attendance by home fans at home games.
To be fair and i know its sounds mercenary but its working for Accrington Stanly a bonus scheme.
I use to get a basic wage, and also get a commision if finished a job before its completion date, like a lot do, nothing wrong with it.
Users browsing this forum: Bare bum, Bing [Bot], black morse, Google [Bot], Keith, Phoenix Shrimp 2017 and 67 guests