BoroRedShrimp wrote:So we just go back to being not as positive because we don't have the same quality.
You can be positive, I think we are all positive but it's more about re-adjusting your expectation level than positivity. In other words, we shouldn't be seeing threads 5 games into the season and on Facebook with people beginning to question whether Jim should still be the manager or not! For me, being positive is thinking we could have quite a good season with a comfortable mid table finish but I'd still be delighted with just not getting relegated.
BoroRedShrimp wrote:I am not comparing the players but we should have a better attitude than accepting where we are now.
Why should we? What makes you think we shouldn't just accept where we are now?
BoroRedShrimp wrote:What has transfer fees got to do with it
It's an indicator of where the club was then in terms of resources available to the manager and where we are at now. In general, less money = lower quality of player.
BoroRedShrimp wrote:especially when we had practically the same squad we got promoted to the football league with
The squad that got promoted was also a well funded one and it continued to be well funded for the first 3 / 4 years of us being a League club.
BoroRedShrimp wrote:We are who we are but we need to believe in ourselves. Accrington have & numerous other smaller clubs have and that goes along way to achieving success.
Hereford, Dagenham, Macclesfield, York, Cheltenham, Torquay, Barnet, Aldershot, Darlington all comparable sized clubs to us that have been relegated whilst we've been a League club.
Bristol Rovers, Tranmere, Leyton Orient, Lincoln, Stockport. Grimsby, Luton all bigger clubs than us that have been relegated.
Why compare ourselves to Accrington all the time and moan about any successes they may be having than comparing us to the dozens of other clubs that we manage to do better than despite the odds forever being against us.