Phil Anderer wrote:Posh, I think you've misunderstood Keith over that. The two at the top who are 'exactly' who the fans want are Rod and Graham. The next bit references the actual owners. Not disagreeing with the principles of what you're saying other than that though.
Posh wrote:Phil Anderer wrote:Posh, I think you've misunderstood Keith over that. The two at the top who are 'exactly' who the fans want are Rod and Graham. The next bit references the actual owners. Not disagreeing with the principles of what you're saying other than that though.
Easy mistake to make. The two at the top are Jason and Colin - if we’re talking money, investment, final decisions, facilities etc.
.Probably a better idea to divide your match reports and opinions about the club into separate articles in future, then those who simply want to read about the game don't have to trawl through potentially alienating waffle first
mrpotatohead wrote:Haha, hot potato, ......for what it's worth Doc I think you do a great job, and the critics should put their pen where their mouth is......I now wish SHITERIDER was still here, coz you could kick off your shoes , get the "popcorn" out , and Fred's your uncle!!!
thedoc wrote:I knew that what I wrote yesterday would provoke the reaction it did.
Little Shrimp wrote:I don't really think there's too much of a problem with what the Doc said. I was prepared to not be too worried about the wages not being paid first time round, but now it's happened again that has alarm bells ringing. I'm shocked at the willingness of some to blindly dismiss the issue. It is worrying and very suspicious and in such a style of report as the Doc's, something worth pointing out.
I, personally, would take a little issue with the calling out of 'so-called fans'. Many of them are paying money and seeing crap so surely have the right to complain. Although, especially on Facebook, some of their complaints and arguments are particularly mind numbing so I can see why the Doc has called them out.
Overall, I think what this really comes down to is what kind of match report people prefer. Some enjoy those in the style of the Doc's, which are lengthy and go into detail surrounding current issues of both clubs - then try and weave it all together where applicable. Others prefer a simple blow by blow report of the game, something to either read what they missed or relive/compare their experience of events. This can be found on the OWS though!
I think reports in the style of the Doc's that raise issues and comment on them are there to be debated, and this should generally be encouraged. Particularly on a football forum! I do, however, feel it is unfair to label his reports as 'waffle' etc. It is a certain style of match reporting, and if it were to be changed to a more blow by blow report, you'd get others complaining it was too dull and dry.
Personally, I think you should keep it up Doc!
amrpotatohead wrote:If I were Doc I would think, right then, if you are gonna gripe, let's see you have a go, to both John L and RR, and every time I did a report I would put my opinions about all sorts on it, he has earned the right to.
thedoc wrote: I think it’s important to keep the profile of Morecambe FC as high as possible.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 34 guests