mrpotatohead wrote:soz, i obviously meant drysdale.
How do you get it so wrong
mrpotatohead wrote:soz, i obviously meant drysdale.
Seasider9601 wrote:Dev was absolutely shattered and every man was passing him - and the game - he was that dead on his feet.
CityShrimp wrote:Robbed - pure and simple.
Realistically, you can't fault Jim or the players, we competed and put in a very good performance but a poor refereeing decision cost us all three points, AGAIN!
In a way it wouldn't be as bad if we were playing poorly because we'd know what we have to do to address it. But there's nothing else we can do at the moment - it's just bad luck over and over again. I feel sorry for Jim. When are we going to get a run of 7 games where we get dodgy penalties and soft, undeserved goals in our favour?
Jettyson wrote:we didn't help ourselves and again have nothing to show for a decent performance especially in the first half.
Keith wrote:Good game? Entertaining? Okay, we were robbed by all accounts, but it's heading in the right direction perhaps?
Freez wrote:The subs were necessary in my opinion. However we could have subbed two others also. The whole eleven put a shift in, and has previously been mentioned Dev and Mullin were absolutely dead on their feet.
At the time we were winning and we still have game in Tuesday, I do buy this, because it's a fact! We have no Miller as he's stil suspended and Wildig hasn't played a full game for weeks, we still have Flemo out also. So is it a good idea to keep people on for 95 minutes when we have another two games in the week?? Really?
So protecting the most tired would seem like common sense to me?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 34 guests