Page 1 of 2
Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:28 pm
by halftimeresults
Liverpool have turned down a 3rd bid from City and refuse to budge from 50m which city won't pay!
Liverpool's American owners are not budging and will let Sterling rot in the reserves!
They fly out tomorrow for the tour of Australia ..if Sterling is not on that plane, he will play with the reserves!......imagine if he's plays on the 1st August at the Globe..The press interest will go through the roof!
And a lot of angry Liverpool fans might just turn up!
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 7:20 am
by mrpotatohead
can't see it going on much longer, but if it did,Jim could suggest to Rodgers that an ideal punishment for sterling would be to loan him to us for 6 months!!
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:21 am
by Uds
An ideal punishment would be for him to be loaned to us, so then we could let him rot in our reserves. Let's be honest if he doesn't want to play for Liverpool he sure as hell wouldn't WANT to play for us on loan, so in which case I'd rather not have him here creating a bad smell over the place not matter how much media attention it may stir up
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:47 am
by Seasider9601
halftimeresults wrote:Liverpool have turned down a 3rd bid from City and refuse to budge from 50m which city won't pay!
Liverpool's American owners are not budging and will let Sterling rot in the reserves!
They fly out tomorrow for the tour of Australia ..if Sterling is not on that plane, he will play with the reserves!......imagine if he's plays on the 1st August at the Globe..The press interest will go through the roof!
And a lot of angry Liverpool fans might just turn up!
But you won't be here to see it mate....!!
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 10:58 am
by marky No.1
Seasider9601 wrote:halftimeresults wrote:Liverpool have turned down a 3rd bid from City and refuse to budge from 50m which city won't pay!
Liverpool's American owners are not budging and will let Sterling rot in the reserves!
They fly out tomorrow for the tour of Australia ..if Sterling is not on that plane, he will play with the reserves!......imagine if he's plays on the 1st August at the Globe..The press interest will go through the roof!
And a lot of angry Liverpool fans might just turn up!
But you won't be here to see it mate....!!
Not another no show!
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 1:03 pm
by BoroRedShrimp
Let him come to us on loan and as punishment make him clear the training pitches.
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 3:51 pm
by Keith
Uds wrote:An ideal punishment would be for him to be loaned to us, so then...
...this thread would have something to do with Morecambe and not be some
OFF TOPIC thread about some over paid prima donna from some other league that people watch on the TV.
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 3:59 pm
by mrpotatohead
there is a very, very vague link via the,possibility of him being loaned to us
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 4:37 pm
by Keith
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 4:44 pm
by marky No.1
Stirling was named in the tour squad, but wanted to stay behind (maybe tired) so he has now been removed.
Mignolet
Bogdan
Fulton
Clyne
Gomez
Lovren
Moreno
Toure
Wisdom
Cleary
Skrtel
Sakho
Maguire
Allen
Henderson
Leas
Milner
Chirivella
Rossiter
Teixeira
Ibe
Kent
Ojo
Wilson
Lallana
Markovic
Ings
Lambert
Origi
Sturridge is still crocked, don't know about Coutinho or Enrique?
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 4:57 pm
by halftimeresults
Keith wrote:Uds wrote:An ideal punishment would be for him to be loaned to us, so then...
...this thread would have something to do with Morecambe and not be some
OFF TOPIC thread about some over paid prima donna from some other league that people watch on the TV.
If you read my post it is Referring to the fact that he could end up playing at the Globe!
I suggest that the Off topic gestapo look elsewhere
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:01 pm
by marky No.1
Sky Sports News confirm a deal has been done at £49M (that's for Sterling, not Edwards)
Definitely o/t now
Goodbye to Van Persie as well
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:07 pm
by Blackpool Shrimp
So football as finally gone mad
49 million for a spoilt brat who is worth nowhere near that figure
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:21 pm
by Keith
halftimeresults wrote:If you read my post it is Referring to the fact that he could end up playing at the Globe!
I suggest that the Off topic gestapo look elsewhere
Which is why I didn't edit the title!
But it was a pretty tenuous link from a grumpy Liverpool fan!
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:31 pm
by marky No.1
Blackpool Shrimp wrote:So football as finally gone mad
49 million for a spoilt brat who is worth nowhere near that figure
Van Persie went for less than £5M, but he is earning £240K a week at Fenerbache - just a million quid a month, not bad I suppose
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
by George Dawes
the Dude at Villa as long as I play first team football, is the complete compared to that Mercenary
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 6:16 pm
by morecambegeek
Liverpool fans conveniently forgetting the club waving money in the direction of sterling to get him to leave QPR as a youngster.
Because loyalty only applies leaving a club, not to the club they leave to join yours (or when you want rid of a player)
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 6:27 pm
by George Dawes
I only think its just because it's a black thing..
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 7:09 pm
by marky No.1
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:59 pm
by Teams like Morecambe
QPR get £9.8 million from this transfer.
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:13 pm
by Posh
This thread isn't off topic. It mentions a player from Garstang.
George Dawes the new Bernard Manning. Lazy racist stereotyping strikes again.
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Sun Jul 12, 2015 11:01 pm
by chipbuns
Just think of how many Scott Bodens we could sign with that amount of money.
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:30 pm
by George Dawes
Posh wrote:George Dawes the new Bernard Manning. Lazy racist stereotyping strikes again.
hook line and sinker, I knew you would bite.
the reply was in reference to posts on this thread and to the hate Stirling is getting in Football(like wanting his legs broke), what's over the top BTW, what the difference with this and when Michael Owen wanted to leave LFC to play for a bigger club and win things, Owen was still a young lad in his mid 20s, and Liverpool & Football fans in general although they weren't happy about it did acceept it, so why is Raheem Sterling any different?
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:35 pm
by Seasider9601
chipbuns wrote:Just think of how many Scott Bodens we could sign with that amount of money.
Who ?????
None, seeing as he's gone to a rival L2 club !!
Re: Raheem Stirling
Posted:
Mon Jul 13, 2015 5:53 pm
by BoroRedShrimp
Seasider9601 wrote:chipbuns wrote:Just think of how many Scott Bodens we could sign with that amount of money.
Who ?????
None, seeing as he's gone to a rival L2 club !!
Fair play to Newport at least someone gave him another chance just like Jack. And according to the Halifax Town Forum it seems we were one of the clubs chasing Boden before he moved to Newport.
http://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/index.php ... den/page-5