Shrimpsvoices

"off topic"... *sigh*

Ah well, Salford equalised against Hartlepool. Playing well.

Well done Keith, the FA cup is deffo o/t

If only we'd wanted it... both in our heads and hearts (still hurts )

Dagenham blow it in injury time.

Anyone sad enough to work out what the FA Cup draw numbers would have been if it had been us instead of Dagenham in the Third Round? Obviously it would move lots of teams. I'm hoping the 're-jigged' draw would be us away at Exeter or Newport or something horrible like that!

But if it would have been Liverpool/Man Utd/Chelsea...

.....and gate was 1900 which suggests that IF we had got through that the away travel would have been small when you consider that they are based in Brighton.

Would almost certainly have lost money (again) as the away team take their travel costs out of the gate I understand before the remainder is split between the FA and both clubs.

Christies Child wrote:.....and gate was 1900 which suggests that IF we had got through that the away travel would have been small when you consider that they are based in Brighton.

Would almost certainly have lost money (again) as the away team take their travel costs out of the gate I understand before the remainder is split between the FA and both clubs.

So you are saying it is a 'good thing' that Dagenham knocked us out? I doff my cap to you sir, for you really are the champion of straw grabbing!

Keith wrote:

Christies Child wrote:.....and gate was 1900 which suggests that IF we had got through that the away travel would have been small when you consider that they are based in Brighton.

Would almost certainly have lost money (again) as the away team take their travel costs out of the gate I understand before the remainder is split between the FA and both clubs.

So you are saying it is a 'good thing' that Dagenham knocked us out? I doff my cap to you sir, for you really are the champion of straw grabbing!

I need to grab as much as I can these days......of course it would have been even more costly as the game wouldn't even have started due to the area 'black out' assuming that they would be able to claim for travel and overnight accom to date.....

That's a thought, it would have been postponed, which means we'd definitely have been in the draw for the Third Round!

And ANOTHER Tuesday night match!

Nobody could have realistically got to the game anyway, even if we had hired a generator. I had forgotten all about it.
Dagenham were winning for 90 minutes, maybe their tactic was to play for a guaranteed tv replay and be in the 3rd round draw. Win/win £££££.
Meanwhile we will have another free FA Cup weekend, so won't need to dust down the Away end for a while longer yet

it might make sense to play the JPS cup tie (one of the 2 legs) that day...assuming Fleetwood are suitably dispatched with tomorrow.........

I know the numbers would have been different but...

Dagenham or Whitehawk have drawn Everton away. Just to rub it in there are a number of League 2 v Prem ties.

Teams like Morecambe wrote:I know the numbers would have been different but...

Dagenham or Whitehawk have drawn Everton away. Just to rub it in there are a number of League 2 v Prem ties.

Just in case Jim was starting to put it behind him...

C'est la vie.

Teams like Morecambe wrote:I know the numbers would have been different but...

Dagenham or Whitehawk have drawn Everton away. Just to rub it in there are a number of League 2 v Prem ties.

I think Morecambe, Dagenham or Whitehawk would have been ball 63 in round three regardless.

For the 20 sides sides qualifying from round two (ball numbers 45-64, League One and lower), numbers are allocated based on the position of ties in the previous round; it isn't allocated alphabetically for such entrants. As Morecambe or Dagenham vs Whitehawk was the penultimate tie drawn in round two, the winner was always going to be ball 63 from 64 - in fact sides playing in round 2 should be able to work out their potential round three number as soon as the second round draw is complete.

Sides who qualify automatically (Premiership and Championship sides) for round three are allocated numbers 1-44 on a alphabetical basis.

All of this means that if Morecambe weren't complete bottle jobs, we would have played Everton away, made a fortune and given the fans a day to remember.

RedRedWine wrote:

Teams like Morecambe wrote:I know the numbers would have been different but...

Dagenham or Whitehawk have drawn Everton away. Just to rub it in there are a number of League 2 v Prem ties.

I think Morecambe, Dagenham or Whitehawk would have been ball 63 in round three regardless.

For the 20 sides sides qualifying from round two (ball numbers 45-64, League One and lower), numbers are allocated based on the position of ties in the previous round; it isn't allocated alphabetically for such entrants. As Morecambe or Dagenham vs Whitehawk was the penultimate tie drawn in round two, the winner was always going to be ball 63 from 64 - in fact sides playing in round 2 should be able to work out their potential round three number as soon as the second round draw is complete.

Sides who qualify automatically (Premiership and Championship sides) for round three are allocated numbers 1-44 on a alphabetical basis.

All of this means that if Morecambe weren't complete bottle jobs, we would have played Everton away, made a fortune and given the fans a day to remember.

That means last few seasons we have missed out on Tottenham at White Hart Lane and Everton at Goodison. We are what we are , its fine lines and bare bones etc .

Gone_Shrimping wrote:

RedRedWine wrote:

Teams like Morecambe wrote:I know the numbers would have been different but...

Dagenham or Whitehawk have drawn Everton away. Just to rub it in there are a number of League 2 v Prem ties.

I think Morecambe, Dagenham or Whitehawk would have been ball 63 in round three regardless.

For the 20 sides sides qualifying from round two (ball numbers 45-64, League One and lower), numbers are allocated based on the position of ties in the previous round; it isn't allocated alphabetically for such entrants. As Morecambe or Dagenham vs Whitehawk was the penultimate tie drawn in round two, the winner was always going to be ball 63 from 64 - in fact sides playing in round 2 should be able to work out their potential round three number as soon as the second round draw is complete.

Sides who qualify automatically (Premiership and Championship sides) for round three are allocated numbers 1-44 on a alphabetical basis.

All of this means that if Morecambe weren't complete bottle jobs, we would have played Everton away, made a fortune and given the fans a day to remember.

That means last few seasons we have missed out on Tottenham at White Hart Lane and Everton at Goodison. We are what we are , its fine lines and bare bones etc .

I'm the harbinger of doom.... move over.

I always wondered how it worked. So first round is alphabetical, then number one in round two, is the winner of the first two teams drawn for round one?