Shrimpsvoices

Wasn't there so cannot comment
Your thoughts pls, why have we left it so late to go out and attack

We should probably be 5 or 6 up, Barnet have been shit, but at least we have got at them.
Big relief all around

Oops 3.1

They might have been shit but back in it 3-1 now

Blackpool Shrimp wrote:They might have been shit but back in it 3-1 now

You little ray of sunshine. BBC stats suggested Barnet were on top. In reality they were totally outclassed. We could have had seven. Miller missed three chances in second half, Fleming stopped Miller getting his hat-trick and their 'back in it' goal was a free kick from a dive that took a huge deflection.

Shame they scored right at the end, made it sound closer than it really was. Some of our passing was sublime.

Played well all over the pitch.

we were never in any danger after going 2 up, they were by far the worst team we have played at home this season, particularly their back 4, todays attendance of just over 1200 was a shocker.

We were the better team and deserved to win

Caged Lion wrote:We were the better team and deserved to win

That sounds like (a tongue-cheek-comment)

shrimpnsave wrote:

Caged Lion wrote:We were the better team and deserved to win

That sounds like (a tongue-cheek-comment)

Nah, but the rolling eyes represent astonishment that we won at home and deservedly so for a change

"How shit must you be, we're winning at home"!!!

Tickled me but they really were poor.

I thought Barnet looked good going forward and Akinde always caused problems with his strength but their back four were very poor and one or two of them looked out of their depth playing league football. We could easily have had six if Miller had put away his second half one on one chances. Well done the lads now on to Dagenham and more positivity please.

1175, ffs even worse

Blackpool Shrimp wrote:They might have been shit but back in it 3-1 now

If you'd been there, you wouldn't have had any reason to worry.

I thought the way the Barnet back 4 played reminded me of a certain team, passed it back a lot dithered when in possession near the half-way line, at times just hoofed it aimlessly forward! Fortunately the MFC from earlier in the season turned up and blitzed them from the start. Which was nice

Thought we played well and Jim got his tactics spot on. We got in behind their defence all day long and I don't think its an exaggeration to say Miller could/should've had 4 or 5 on the day had his touch round the keeper been better.

Barnet were the worst defensive unit I've seen all season.... and I've been watching ours all year long! So naive to get done time and time again by the same diagonal pass. The defending for Kenyons goal was abysmal... how can you be unmarked at the back post from a corner?

RedRedWine wrote:Thought we played well and Jim got his tactics spot on. We got in behind their defence all day long and I don't think its an exaggeration to say Miller could/should've had 4 or 5 on the day had his touch round the keeper been better.

Barnet were the worst defensive unit I've seen all season.... and I've been watching ours all year long! So naive to get done time and time again by the same diagonal pass. The defending for Kenyons goal was abysmal... how can you be unmarked at the back post from a corner?

Kenyon made a really good late run for his goal but amazing no Barnet player was marking him !

How bad was the Barnet number 5 ! He was pedestrian speed and had no chance when the ball was played over him when he was high up the pitch.

They defended set pieces like....



Us!