Christies Child wrote:Maybe our ambitions to be a Football league club have been the deep routed casue of where we find oursleves. The Board worked hard to deliver a team and stadium fit to establish the club as an FL club but the lack of finances generated by the club itself resulted in the financial burdon being on the shoulders of the Directors and the Chairman which it looks as though have proved too much to continue.
Shrimpy wrote:Christies Child wrote:Maybe our ambitions to be a Football league club have been the deep routed casue of where we find oursleves. The Board worked hard to deliver a team and stadium fit to establish the club as an FL club but the lack of finances generated by the club itself resulted in the financial burdon being on the shoulders of the Directors and the Chairman which it looks as though have proved too much to continue.
BINGO!
steve mfc wrote:Well I just had a quick look on Wikipedia and there are about 60 football clubs listed as having entered administration some of them appear more than once and four ended up being dissolved so it goes to show the extent of the problem. You can bet in probably every case its because a club has lived beyond its means, the thing is nobody complains when things are going well and success is being achieved because an owner is prepared to fund the short fall.
How many more clubs are like us teetering on the brink or waiting for their current owner to call it a day leaving them in an untenable position.
Gnasher wrote:Seriously Neil, are you still putting all the blame on Diego? There are no facts on which to make a judgement, there's no statements being put out by the club with the exception of a resignation statement.
We don't know what has gone on, what was said or promised. Diego might be considering legal action over a bum deal. We simply haven't got a clue and until some facts are known, anyone could be as innocent or guilty as the rest.
Gnasher wrote:I'm not putting the blame on anyone yet. Don't you think the lack of information from anyone, including the person who sold the shares to Diego, is a concern?
Seasider9601 wrote:For anyone on Facebook have a look at a post just gone on the Fans Club page about Abdullah.
I've shared it on my page for anyone who is my friend on there.
It makes for grim reading.
Seasider9601 wrote:For anyone on Facebook have a look at a post just gone on the Fans Club page about Abdullah.
I've shared it on my page for anyone who is my friend on there.
It makes for grim reading.
Shrimpy wrote:Christies Child wrote:Maybe our ambitions to be a Football league club have been the deep routed casue of where we find oursleves. The Board worked hard to deliver a team and stadium fit to establish the club as an FL club but the lack of finances generated by the club itself resulted in the financial burdon being on the shoulders of the Directors and the Chairman which it looks as though have proved too much to continue.
BINGO!
Westgate Wanderer wrote:If it wasn't for PMG we would NEVER have got into the Football League! Perhaps the rot started under the previous (experienced) manager, then the current manager took over and the crowds declined,losing the club money. The product we have watched o n the pitch over the last few years HAS to come into the equation.As everybody says "we're all in it together" can't just blame one person!!
Posh wrote:Shrimpy wrote:Christies Child wrote:Maybe our ambitions to be a Football league club have been the deep routed casue of where we find oursleves. The Board worked hard to deliver a team and stadium fit to establish the club as an FL club but the lack of finances generated by the club itself resulted in the financial burdon being on the shoulders of the Directors and the Chairman which it looks as though have proved too much to continue.
BINGO!
OK. In my view there was absolutely nothing wrong with targeting promotion to the Football League. The problem was it became everything and all that was good about Morecambe FC went out of the window. Not at the demand of the fans but at the owners control.
We'd become a club that found young talent and developed it - Thompson, Perkins, Carlton, Hunter, Curtis, Smith etc. That went out of the window when Jim Harvey was sacked.
We were an egalitarian club with the North Stand as good a place to watch as the Main Stand. All were equal sharing the same bar and facilities. That went out with the new ground design.
We were a club that encouraged volunteers and the support of companies. That went out of the window when it became a personal fiefdom with the magnificent ego of his name on the stand and his unqualified friends running the design of the ground in an incredibly cack-handed fashion.
This is a club built on pies and pints whose owner decided, without any customer consultation, that he would flog us wild boar stakes for £23 in a bar that looks like an airport lounge.
This is not about a battle for the Football League but one of money, ego and arrogance. Who was there when loans were repaid to shareholders when we received the Sainsbury's cash? Who got the money when Directors bought the land and gave it to the club for its future not short-term personal gain? Who sold us short to a Brazilian kid who played FIFA agent?
We could have built a great Football League club instead we've built one man's folly. Hopefully we'll never make the same mistake again.
mrpotatohead wrote:Yes I agree about Jim, and his loyal hardworking staff , but MG, your culpabilty comment aiimed at the minor directors is a bit uncalled for, there has been nothing illegal or untoward occuring prior to the takeover, so they are culpable for what? giving up money and time to help,keep the club they love afloat isn't illegal, whatever happens next the remaining board members are important to the stability of the club and are blameless, unless you know otherwise?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests