Shrimpsvoices

Was it that hot that a drinks break was necessary as it would appear that this isn't the first time this season that a game a Cheatinboro have had the flow of a game change in favour of the home team immeadiately after a drink break

What are the rules (if any) governing a drinks break...

If Cheatingboro are making it up as they go along, then it's worth the EFL stamping down on it ASAP.

What "drinks break"? You mean the time when McGurk was receiving treatment, and all the players went across (apart from either of the goalkeepers)? It wasn't a 'time out', that's a different type of "football"

I know goalkeepers take bottles of drinking water with them, and leave behind the goal.

but this season noticed our Gary Thompson who's a wide man taking two bottles with him, and leaving them near the halfway line different coloured water too? but if it helps him or other team mates rehydrate when there's some time out then can't see the problem with it, it's certainly not effecting game time.

Keith wrote:What "drinks break"? You mean the time when McGurk was receiving treatment, and all the players went across (apart from either of the goalkeepers)? It wasn't a 'time out', that's a different type of "football"

Just asking the question from what I read on their forum..

The highlights seemed to suggest that we didn't play that well but reports suggest otherwise...

George Dawes wrote:I know goalkeepers take bottles of drinking water with them, and leave behind the goal.

but this season noticed our Gary Thompson who's a wide man taking two bottles with him, and leaving them near the halfway line different coloured water too? but if it helps him or other team mates rehydrate when there's some time out then can't see the problem with it, it's certainly not effecting game time.

Les (kitman) always places a few bottles around the pitch before kick off

Christies Child wrote:The highlights seemed to suggest that we didn't play that well but reports suggest otherwise...

Highlights were wrong!

Keith wrote:

Christies Child wrote:The highlights seemed to suggest that we didn't play that well but reports suggest otherwise...

Highlights were wrong!

.....of course.....

Christies Child wrote:

Keith wrote:

Christies Child wrote:The highlights seemed to suggest that we didn't play that well but reports suggest otherwise...

Highlights were wrong!

.....of course.....

Ah, the all knowing, all seeing magic armchair of Storth.

Anyway, it's Cheatanage.

Keith wrote:

Christies Child wrote:The highlights seemed to suggest that we didn't play that well but reports suggest otherwise...

Highlights were wrong!

fake highlights?

Problem with highlights is that they often give a misleading interpretation of any game..and these in particular from other reports are a prime example. But any neutral looking at them will probably regard the home team as being in total command.

Those who actually went know different...as Jimbo indicated in his post match interview.

The stats are very even, but that means nowt, as we know.