Jim interview post Exeter

Jim interview post Exeter

Postby MFC-Manc » Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:47 pm

I'm getting by just the best I can, While you're directing traffic
User avatar
MFC-Manc
 
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby MFC-Manc » Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:57 pm

Jam on the m6 and the coach had a crash??? On the way down
I'm getting by just the best I can, While you're directing traffic
User avatar
MFC-Manc
 
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby BerlinWaller » Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:55 pm

It is not for me to question the unquestionable but why didn't Jim change things once he noticed Tisdale had done a number on him and prevent Exeter from pulling our pants down time and again?
BerlinWaller
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:42 am

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby black morse » Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:18 pm

Thought Jim was spot on with his assessment.
black morse
 
Posts: 5539
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:59 am
Location: South Devon

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby BerlinWaller » Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:49 pm

Assessing it is one thing, being reactive during the game is another
BerlinWaller
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:42 am

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby black morse » Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:07 pm

BerlinWaller wrote:Assessing it is one thing, being reactive during the game is another


To be fair losing Barry in the first minute meant that one sub had already been used and after their first goal the defence seemed to lose confidence. I feel that might not have been the case if Barry had been there. The first two goals were really down to poor defending. Pulling one back was great and gave hope until the killer just before halftime. By then we were 3-1 down and I was expecting another substitution at that stage but as it was we ran out of subs when the last sub was injured. I agree that by then it was too late anyway.
black morse
 
Posts: 5539
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:59 am
Location: South Devon

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby Gone_Shrimping » Sun Oct 01, 2017 6:32 pm

black morse wrote:
BerlinWaller wrote:Assessing it is one thing, being reactive during the game is another


To be fair losing Barry in the first minute meant that one sub had already been used and after their first goal the defence seemed to lose confidence. I feel that might not have been the case if Barry had been there. The first two goals were really down to poor defending. Pulling one back was great and gave hope until the killer just before halftime. By then we were 3-1 down and I was expecting another substitution at that stage but as it was we ran out of subs when the last sub was injured. I agree that by then it was too late anyway.


Agreed about Baz. He does organise and instruct the back line as well as being a superb shot-stopper.

I hope he is available for the Crawley game.
Gone_Shrimping
 
Posts: 5312
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 7:49 am

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby BerlinWaller » Sun Oct 01, 2017 7:35 pm

Jim says he got it wrong himself and was caught out by Exeter's tactics on the day. To be fair, he doesn't really use Baz as an excuse.
BerlinWaller
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:42 am

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby George Dawes » Sun Oct 01, 2017 7:38 pm

the back four was the same as what played and kept out another inform side Luton this week, so losing Baz so early on was obviously the big difference in the scoreline.

I expect Luton and Exeter to be there abouts.
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby KenH » Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:37 am

Listening to Jim's interview, it sounds like the lads didn't do any training between Tuesday and Saturday's matches. If I hear rightly, he says he gave them Wednesday and Thursday off. Then it took longer than expected to drive down to Exeter on Friday. If they didn't do any training, then it kinds of explains the poor performance.
KenH
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby George Dawes » Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:43 am

KenH wrote:Listening to Jim's interview, it sounds like the lads didn't do any training between Tuesday and Saturday's matches. If I hear rightly, he says he gave them Wednesday and Thursday off. Then it took longer than expected to drive down to Exeter on Friday. If they didn't do any training, then it kinds of explains the poor performance.

a lot is too much blamed on training or not training in football.

I would like to point out Wild Card Denmark and underdogs in Euro92 won the tournament with no preparation or training prior to turning up at the last minute, and went on Schooling former champions Holland and World Champions Germany!

and when asked what's the secret, Janson replied we'd all just had a good rest and went out and played for fun!
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Jim interview post Exeter

Postby John L » Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:51 am

Sounds like we need a bit of hygge and streaky bacon then!
John L
 
Posts: 5094
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:41 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Keith, MfcChris and 20 guests