BerlinWaller wrote:Assessing it is one thing, being reactive during the game is another
black morse wrote:BerlinWaller wrote:Assessing it is one thing, being reactive during the game is another
To be fair losing Barry in the first minute meant that one sub had already been used and after their first goal the defence seemed to lose confidence. I feel that might not have been the case if Barry had been there. The first two goals were really down to poor defending. Pulling one back was great and gave hope until the killer just before halftime. By then we were 3-1 down and I was expecting another substitution at that stage but as it was we ran out of subs when the last sub was injured. I agree that by then it was too late anyway.
KenH wrote:Listening to Jim's interview, it sounds like the lads didn't do any training between Tuesday and Saturday's matches. If I hear rightly, he says he gave them Wednesday and Thursday off. Then it took longer than expected to drive down to Exeter on Friday. If they didn't do any training, then it kinds of explains the poor performance.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Keith, MfcChris and 20 guests