Shrimpsvoices

MFC-Manc wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42837391

Good lad. Gives a good insight into the team spirit of our lads. Pity we will not be able to keep him. Wigan may be scoring goals without him but they won't let him go for what we could afford.

black morse wrote:Pity we will not be able to keep him. Wigan may be scoring goals without him but they won't let him go for what we could afford.

No, but sending players back to their parent club better than when they arrived just enhance our chances of taking other good, young players in the future. Danny Ward was only with us for a short time, but spoke very highly of us on his return to Liverpool.

Totally agree with Keith.....just a pity we can't find a club prepared to loan us an experienced midfielder who can't get into his first team but needs games and not Development or Reserve games.

Keith wrote:

black morse wrote:Pity we will not be able to keep him. Wigan may be scoring goals without him but they won't let him go for what we could afford.

No, but sending players back to their parent club better than when they arrived just enhance our chances of taking other good, young players in the future. Danny Ward was only with us for a short time, but spoke very highly of us on his return to Liverpool.

You may be right but it doesn't seem to be working this transfer window so far

black morse wrote:You may be right but it doesn't seem to be working this transfer window so far

That is, of course, a very good point

So why replace him today ?

steve mfc wrote:So why replace him today ?

So you'd be sure of your 5 points

black morse wrote:

steve mfc wrote:So why replace him today ?

So you'd be sure of your 5 points

Touche

steve mfc wrote:So why replace him today ?

Jim said it's because he hasn't trained much. Once again, looked alright to me though, and more effective than Oliver.

John L wrote:

steve mfc wrote:So why replace him today ?

Jim said it's because he hasn't trained much. Once again, looked alright to me though, and more effective than Oliver.

He clearly didn't want to be sub-ed off - the look on his face when he saw his number on the sub board -not a happy man at all.

KenH wrote:

John L wrote:

steve mfc wrote:So why replace him today ?

Jim said it's because he hasn't trained much. Once again, looked alright to me though, and more effective than Oliver.

He clearly didn't want to be sub-ed off - the look on his face when he saw his number on the sub board -not a happy man at all.

I can't blame him.

With that substitution any chance we had of winning the match went! Clueless. Sadly Wildig is a shadow of his former self at the moment, no guile or energy about him at all. At least a point thrown away by our genius manager. Another half time lead thrown away by negative tactics in the second half/ What does JB have against attacking footballers? No doubt he will blame the ref, weather, the opposition, Jupiter was in the wrong alignment! The two late lotto substitutions were baffling. I think Barnet might finish in the bottom two, but honestly who else is worse than us this season?

So I gather the volume busting half time bollocking and two subs didn't be change Mansfields will at all, just our "negative tactics".

Nobody was happy about the 95th minute winner but forgetting there are two sides who affect the result yet again is just plain silly.
Change the record.