marky No.1 wrote:Not known you to have strong feelings mate , historically it is true that boards remain, even if not currently paid for, until someone else pays money to replace them, obviously this may have changed under our new regime
Zippy wrote:marky No.1 wrote:Not known you to have strong feelings mate , historically it is true that boards remain, even if not currently paid for, until someone else pays money to replace them, obviously this may have changed under our new regime
Its the one thing i understand about Belin Wallers vantage point, he doesnt have to loik at him every time the balk goes for a corner!!
Zippy wrote:marky No.1 wrote:Not known you to have strong feelings mate , historically it is true that boards remain, even if not currently paid for, until someone else pays money to replace them, obviously this may have changed under our new regime
Its the one thing i understand about Belin Wallers vantage point, he doesnt have to look at him every time the ball goes for a corner!! And yes i am offering
Blimey poor Geoffrey is hardly in the ground and he's gone all political!Zippy wrote:I am aware of at least 2 advertising boards at the ground, that are legacy , i can understand why the club may leave them on file, given removal most probably invokes cost. However political advertising i would suggest should be treated with more rigour, my question is 1. Is David morriss(mortis) ad fully paid up?2 if not is there some other reason it remains ? 3 . If no do the club require some sponsor to remove it, pm me if thats the case - there are hopefully strict rules around political advertising , and i hope this **** does not have a free pass, through default
Keith wrote:Does Zippy have a reason to suspect that the David Morris board isn’t being paid for?
If it isn’t then I’d agree it should be removed as it is not the same as standard sponsorship. That said, I think all sponsorship boards that aren’t paid up should be removed or painted over, otherwise, where’s the incentive to renew next season? Plus, if I chose to use a business that advertise, on the basis that they support the club, I want to know that they still offer that support.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Keith wrote:Does Zippy have a reason to suspect that the David Morris board isn’t being paid for?
If it isn’t then I’d agree it should be removed as it is not the same as standard sponsorship. That said, I think all sponsorship boards that aren’t paid up should be removed or painted over, otherwise, where’s the incentive to renew next season? Plus, if I chose to use a business that advertise, on the basis that they support the club, I want to know that they still offer that support.
From memory all the adverts on the wall around DM were taken down in the Summer and replaced by new hoardings so that would suggest payment has been received.
Sakhalin Shrimp wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:Keith wrote:Does Zippy have a reason to suspect that the David Morris board isn’t being paid for?
If it isn’t then I’d agree it should be removed as it is not the same as standard sponsorship. That said, I think all sponsorship boards that aren’t paid up should be removed or painted over, otherwise, where’s the incentive to renew next season? Plus, if I chose to use a business that advertise, on the basis that they support the club, I want to know that they still offer that support.
From memory all the adverts on the wall around DM were taken down in the Summer and replaced by new hoardings so that would suggest payment has been received.
There's a couple still up for a company that no longer exists, clearly shown in Keith's screenshot of the Tranmere handball/corner incident on Saturday.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Sakhalin Shrimp wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:
From memory all the adverts on the wall around DM were taken down in the Summer and replaced by new hoardings so that would suggest payment has been received.
There's a couple still up for a company that no longer exists, clearly shown in Keith's screenshot of the Tranmere handball/corner incident on Saturday.
That would be at the Heart Radio end. Certainly the Berlin Wall hoardings were stripped away in the Summer.
Keith wrote:Does Zippy have a reason to suspect that the David Morris board isn’t being paid for?
If it isn’t then I’d agree it should be removed as it is not the same as standard sponsorship.
Keith wrote:I think all sponsorship boards that aren’t paid up should be removed or painted over, otherwise, where’s the incentive to renew next season? Plus, if I chose to use a business that advertise, on the basis that they support the club, I want to know that they still offer that support.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 38 guests