redrobo wrote:Good report as usual but please give it a rest about wages, boardroom issues and other negativity towards our club. It's all been discussed in length many times and I for one get really pissed off with the way some fans keeping going on about issues that as fans we can't resolve.
thedoc wrote:redrobo wrote:Good report as usual but please give it a rest about wages, boardroom issues and other negativity towards our club. It's all been discussed in length many times and I for one get really pissed off with the way some fans keeping going on about issues that as fans we can't resolve.
Well if that's not a reason to despair, I don't know what is. The world is there to be changed, not just to be observed as if we have no influence on anything. Only cynics, morons, pessimists or people of a political outlook which I don't share think things should stay as they are, come Hell or High Water. Shall we just stand idly by and let the club go down the plughole? Our club is being let down at Board level and has been for ages. Maybe you have a vested interest in not wanting ordinary fans to rock the boat as the Captain rearranges the deckchairs on the Titanic but I'm not going to stay silent and just dumbly watch this happen. Five years from now, we won't have a club at all if the sort of people who have steered its course in recent years are still in charge. We may not be able to resolve it - but if we don't at least try, it's time to give up altogether, isn't it?
redrobo wrote: The new owners have cleared the decks and it's a new start... new ones are now on board and deserve out TOTAL support.
thedoc wrote:redrobo wrote: The new owners have cleared the decks and it's a new start... new ones are now on board and deserve out TOTAL support.
Why?
redrobo wrote:At this moment there is no other alternative than what our new owners have provided to date.
redrobo wrote:You seem so anti the current Board and owners but you offer no alternative solution.
thedoc wrote:redrobo wrote:At this moment there is no other alternative than what our new owners have provided to date.
thedoc wrote:I knew that what I wrote yesterday would provoke the reaction it did. I made the point in my piece that there are those among us who want Jim Bentley out and I have suggested that theirs is an emotional rather than a rational reaction and said why. It's no surprise that these people call what I have written a `rant' - again, that is an emotional rather than a rational response. They don't like what I've written but rather than addressing what I've said, they simply dismiss it. What I have written is the truth as I see it, full stop. Pretending that the iceberg was not there would never have stopped the Titanic crashing into it. So let's get real. I'd like to see my club tell one and all of us what exactly is going on in the Boardroom. As I said yesterday, there has been a deafening silence about the reasons for a second failure to play staff and players on time. The sudden connection with Worcester Warriors seems to be the Elephant in the Room - if we all ignore it, it doesn't stop being an elephant. does it? - any more than an iceberg disappears if we all choose to look the other way. Some of my fellow fans say that what I have written is disloyal to the club. But to me, pretending that there is nothing wrong at the heart of Morecambe Football Club is the ultimate disloyalty. As I wrote yesterday, unless significant changes are made - such as other things I mentioned such as training facilities - this club is heading for ultimate failure. And what will we all say then, when it's far too late?
Keith wrote:On the flip side, new people at the top, who are exactly the people the fans wanted in place and anyone who knows them, knows they can trust them as they genuinely have Morecambe FC's interests at heart. And newish owners still. I'm prepared to give them a honeymoon period and cut some slack.
Posh wrote:
I’m pleased the Shrimps Trust, who do an excellent job, are now having far greater dialogue with the club but so much more needs to be done. It really is time that the fans (and the players and community) are fully respected.
Anyone seen the plans for the roof behind the Home Stand? If not, why not, we’re the ones who will use it. We could save money on it by sharing our experience.
Posh wrote:Keith wrote:On the flip side, new people at the top, who are exactly the people the fans wanted in place and anyone who knows them, knows they can trust them as they genuinely have Morecambe FC's interests at heart. And newish owners still. I'm prepared to give them a honeymoon period and cut some slack.
I’m hoping there is some irony in there. If exactly meant two blokes from Essex buying the club with a company listed as a “real estate investment company” and lending the money through a separate company allegedly in Mayfair but actually on a not so glamorous Essex road, then it’s not what I would have had at the top of my list nor would it have implied they had ‘the best of interests of the club at heart’.
My take on yet another of Roger’s excellent match reports is that you view the club as one thing or another.
Either a football club is like any other company in that it is ultimately responsible to its shareholders, in this case it’s Bond Group Investments and it’s their company and they can do whatever they like. If they want to buy Morecambe to turn it into a Premier League club, buy it for a laugh or to sell off its ground or screw it for money for huge personal profits (see Kingstonian, Blackpool, etc.), then that’s their choice. Having said that, the best companies put their customers first and build good relationships to boost revenues and thus bring financial rewards to their shareholders.
Or a football club is a vital part of the community and a source of local pride, where fans are at its heart and are nothing without them. In this case the company that owns the club (and any company that owns that company) is merely a custodian, there to run it in the best interests of the fans and the community.
Personally, I believe the latter. In which case Roger is entirely right in his comments.
I’m pleased the Shrimps Trust, who do an excellent job, are now having far greater dialogue with the club but so much more needs to be done. It really is time that the fans (and the players and community) are fully respected.
Anyone seen the plans for the roof behind the Home Stand? If not, why not, we’re the ones who will use it. We could save money on it by sharing our experience.
Posh wrote:Keith wrote:On the flip side, new people at the top, who are exactly the people the fans wanted in place and anyone who knows them, knows they can trust them as they genuinely have Morecambe FC's interests at heart. And newish owners still. I'm prepared to give them a honeymoon period and cut some slack.
I’m hoping there is some irony in there. If exactly meant two blokes from Essex buying the club with a company listed as a “real estate investment company” and lending the money through a separate company allegedly in Mayfair but actually on a not so glamorous Essex road, then it’s not what I would have had at the top of my list nor would it have implied they had ‘the best of interests of the club at heart’.
My take on yet another of Roger’s excellent match reports is that you view the club as one thing or another.
Either a football club is like any other company in that it is ultimately responsible to its shareholders, in this case it’s Bond Group Investments and it’s their company and they can do whatever they like. If they want to buy Morecambe to turn it into a Premier League club, buy it for a laugh or to sell off its ground or screw it for money for huge personal profits (see Kingstonian, Blackpool, etc.), then that’s their choice. Having said that, the best companies put their customers first and build good relationships to boost revenues and thus bring financial rewards to their shareholders.
Or a football club is a vital part of the community and a source of local pride, where fans are at its heart and are nothing without them. In this case the company that owns the club (and any company that owns that company) is merely a custodian, there to run it in the best interests of the fans and the community.
Personally, I believe the latter. In which case Roger is entirely right in his comments.
I’m pleased the Shrimps Trust, who do an excellent job, are now having far greater dialogue with the club but so much more needs to be done. It really is time that the fans (and the players and community) are fully respected.
Anyone seen the plans for the roof behind the Home Stand? If not, why not, we’re the ones who will use it. We could save money on it by sharing our experience.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 35 guests