Shrimpsvoices

Tommy Robinson, is going to be screening on Youtube and on two screens at Media City on Saturday after the biased BBC tried to fit him up, but he turned the tables on them.Will there be resignations?This is going to be a massive, hopefully their will be no trouble from others.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 76991.html

For anyone else who wants to know why he's whinging this week.

Shame this drivel spouting lout is getting promoted on a Morecambe forum.
Thanks for the heads up as to where to avoid his uneducated dribbling knuckle dragging supporters at the weekend though. Cheers.

halfwayprawn wrote:Tommy Robinson, is going to be screening on Youtube and on two screens at Media City on Saturday after the biased BBC tried to fit him up, but he turned the tables on them.Will there be resignations?This is going to be a massive, hopefully their will be no trouble from others.

shrimperteer wrote:Shame this drivel spouting lout is getting promoted on a Morecambe forum.
Thanks for the heads up as to where to avoid his uneducated dribbling knuckle dragging supporters at the weekend though. Cheers.

Hmm... I'm not sure what to do with this. Broadly I agree with Shrimperteer. On the other hand, if it is to be a forum that allows open discussions, often political, then I don't want to shut threads down or delete them simply because I find them repugnant. For the moment, it will stay.

As for Halfwayprawn... Yeah, Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon is being 'fitted up' by the media quoting him and showing videos of the nasty drug dealing thug actually speaking.

halfwayprawn wrote:This is going to be a massive, hopefully their will be no trouble from others.

English Defence League

shrimperteer wrote:

halfwayprawn wrote:This is going to be a massive, hopefully their will be no trouble from others.

English Defence League

Maybe we should form an English Language Defence League?

There, There. and no way am i an EDL supporter,but at least someone is actually calling out the BBC.

halfwayprawn wrote:Tommy Robinson, is going to be screening on Youtube and on two screens at Media City on Saturday after the biased BBC tried to fit him up, but he turned the tables on them.Will there be resignations?This is going to be a massive, hopefully their will be no trouble from others.

No it’s not going to be massive.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is a convicted thug and mortgage fraudster who happily gloats he takes illegal drugs and can buy them anywhere. He also nearly ruined the trial of child abusers where he was too thick to understand the law and where he was rightly convicted of contempt of court. He needs to climb back down the sewer and stop making money - his main aim - from being a rent-a-gob fascist.

Posh wrote:He also nearly ruined the trial of child abusers where he was too thick to understand the law and where he was rightly convicted of contempt of court.

Sorry Michael, have to disagree with you. He knew EXACTLY what he was doing. He wanted the trial to collapse and the guilty rapists to be set free, so that his knuckle dragging followers would all get angry and another step towards the race war that he hopes to start. Meanwhile, going to prison for a few months is acceptable to him. He gets to be a martyr and at the same time, morons set up a 'go fund Tommy' page that raised hundreds of thousands of pounds. If I was told I could get over £100,000 for spending three months in prison, I reckon I'd be up for it too.

He's a foul, drug dealing thug & convicted fraudster but don't underestimate the toad.

halfwayprawn wrote:There, There. and no way am i an EDL supporter,but at least someone is actually calling out the BBC.

Calling them out on what exactly? Spelling our club's name wrong from time to time? Its frankly embarrassing paranoia all this.

If people who believe this rubbish had a brain cell it would die of loneliness.

Cue "fake news, mainstream media, muslamic ray guns" said in a borderline educationally subnormal voice.

Hi HWP sticking to the matter you were discussing and avoiding the intemperate name calling and labelling ,seemingly used as an alternative to debating the matter raised, my thoughts on the Panodrama .



It is unclear if there is much that will be revealed on Saturday beyond the predictable matter of journalists on the BBC Flagship programme living it large at the expense of the BBC.

And also a confirmation if one was needed that the BBC is continuing to veer into a Metropolitan London centric, Momentum riddled “opiate of the people” .

Whatever transpires on Saturday with Panodrama , it will be of no inconvenience to the BBC who are more than adequately resourced (by the public) to absorb and counter any matters arising .

There’s nothing particularly new about this, and I personally have ditched the BBC for good and decline to have a TV licence , the last to go was Radio 4 , which is now a bewildering mess of

politically correct programming. I expect more people take this course of action over time , and eventually the BBC to become a subscription service and a choice within a broader offer of media services.

I can't see how any revelation about the BBC can be worse than the revelation that some in the BBC knew what Jimmy Saville was up to and yet did nothing.

paschahound wrote:I can't see how any revelation about the BBC can be worse than the revelation that some in the BBC knew what Jimmy Saville was up to and yet did nothing.

Exactly, and they still run a Children In Need appeal every year.....

Zippy wrote:It is unclear if there is much that will be revealed on Saturday beyond the predictable matter of journalists on the BBC Flagship programme living it large at the expense of the BBC.

Whatever transpires on Saturday with Panodrama , it will be of no inconvenience to the BBC who are more than adequately resourced (by the public) to absorb and counter any matters arising .

So, basically, the BBC's flagship investigative programme decides to investigate your mate Stephen - a man with a history of deception, fraud, violence and drug-taking and you don't like it. The programme hasn't even come out and you want to bring in censorship.

And also a confirmation if one was needed that the BBC is continuing to veer into a Metropolitan London centric, Momentum riddled “opiate of the people” .

Yeah! That's why protested outside the BBC's huge offices in err... Manchester.

There is no mention of any individual in my post, nor is there any mention of censorship. you make dimwitted comments , and associations that you cannot support. The views expressed are long held and entirety my own. Its clear that governance of the BBC is in London, and it has offices in various locations. Similar to the labour party, who have been kicked out of Scotland, mauled in the north, due to its london centric momentum riddled leadership.

Zippy wrote:There is no mention of any individual in my post, nor is there any mention of censorship. you make dimwitted comments , and associations that you cannot support. The views expressed are long held and entirety my own. Its clear that governance of the BBC is in London, and it has offices in various locations. Similar to the labour party, who have been kicked out of Scotland, mauled in the north, due to its london centric momentum riddled leadership.

Nonsense. You attack the BBC for being left wing with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. You also attack it for being London centric, which it always has yet it has moved whole departments to Manchester, filing of major programmes around the country and extended its operations in Belfast, Cardiff, Glasgow and Bristol to better reflect the geographical diversity of Britain.

Even your attack on Labour is gibberish. Labour only had one seat in Scotland thanks to their farcical backing of the Tories in the independence referendum. Since a more left wing party came in it increased its share of the vote and won 6 more seats. Labour also didn’t lose a single seat in the North and gained lots to the point there isn’t a single Tory in Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds.

Posh thanks for your further comments , and for recognising that I was not referring to any particular individuall or indeed advocating censorship of the BBC or Panorama in any form , as mentioned I am not a consumer of their product any longer , and therefore am not exposed to, or care much for their outputs.



Without wishing to be pedantic you state “ You attacked the BBC for being left wing” when there is no use of the meaningless term “left wing” In the posts I have made, it’s just one of those labels that people attach , and I try not to use because each individuals perception of what is left and right wing may be different .



As ever the truth in these matters is positional , and I feel the BBC Governance and Programming represents something that has left me and swathes of others behind , as indeed have the Labour party in even greater numbers. I have not the time or inclination to engage in a thesis on the BBC , and my opinions were offered to HWP in response to his posting, these opinions are long held. If you enjoy the BBC fair play to you, at least the BBC are not coming across as outwardly anti-Semitic yet.



My Gibberish “attack” on Labour , seems to have struck a chord , but I’m afraid your response is not that convincing , the current policies, personalities, and stance of the leadership has left masses of disenfranchised long standing labour supporters such as myself.



Faced with a totally incompetent and schism ridden Conservative party , the Momentum inspired Labour Party have manged to present themselves as even more screwed, up, and this is a very unpalatable time for many who supported the party over past years, any “attack” (well actually its observations) is born of frustration at the loss of a once great institution.



To be frank despite the detestation I feel for our incumbent MP in Morecambe and Lunesdale, if there was any whiff in the air of the labour candidate getting in I would swallow hard and tactically vote for him.

The numbers you mentioned in your post were insufficient to secure a Corbyn labour Government (thank god) and as you know , the Labour Party recently managed to lose 8 seats in the space of a week, without a vote being cast ! . http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/ will not provide much comfort either. It’s not looking great and unfortunately I think its reaching the point where we will never see a labour Government in office again, unless there is some inspired and visionary leadership hiding under a bushel somewhere. But it seems for now the best labour can do is get Degsy back on board, remember Kinnock at conference calling out Militant ? (I was still labour then) great speech , great leader, took the right course but unfortunately the party is back in the same space.
If you are a passionate labour supporter , fair play to you, I was once to, but been sold out cant hack them now

I have no idea what's going on now, but it's a shame that this guy has gone backwards since he left the EDL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ji2Un7K3dM

This speech at Oxford Uni is worth a watch too for some background as to why he's like he is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YQ94jFg_4A

The BBC seems to generally get calls of being biased from left and right, which if anything probably indicates neutrality. If you support Tommy Robinson then you need to give your head a wobble. The BBC are right to investigate someone who portrays himself as some kind of martyr for England in a grotesque Islamaphobic crusade. Especially when they have committed all kinds of criminal offences. There is no 'media conspiracy', they are merely reporting accurately on him. A vile man who has leeched off the divisive state of the country and then added more fuel to the fire.

1) Not a fan of Tommy Robinson(goes too far), but to be fair unlike a lot of his critics he's actually taken time and read the "Quran" and has made some valid points regarding that culture and also with media black outs failing to report stories.

2) I gave up with the BBC years ago, certainly the biggest players with " Project Fear" and thought control,, i prefer to watch the C4 news.

3) Wish the BBC would have TV adverts and fund themselves like ie. ITV, C4 etc etc.

4) Mortgage fraud, people who tell lenders there in full-time employment when there not fall into this bracket, if where going to be judgmental.

Little Shrimp wrote:The BBC seems to generally get calls of being biased from left and right, which if anything probably indicates neutrality. If you support Tommy Robinson then you need to give your head a wobble. The BBC are right to investigate someone who portrays himself as some kind of martyr for England in a grotesque Islamaphobic crusade. Especially when they have committed all kinds of criminal offences. There is no 'media conspiracy', they are merely reporting accurately on him. A vile man who has leeched off the divisive state of the country and then added more fuel to the fire.

Quite right, well said!

He's been banned off Instagram and Facebook now.

He needs the treatment Nick Griffin got. Get him on QT, get him in the mainstream press, show him in the light that he craves and deserves then watch him burn out fizzle and die.

I've watched all of Mr Lennon's videos to get a feel for what he's about. For every Oxford Union address there's 20 occasions where he's used flagrant clickbait and lies to push an agenda.

One of his supporters on Facebook reliably told me that there are huge areas on Manchester that are no go areas to whites.

Amusingly, the areas that he quoted (where the bomber resided) are where I live, and not only that, right next to 2 mosques.

He's made some good points in his errr "career" - however the sheer weight of racist dog whistle bullshit that accompanies it shows me he's either trying to divide the nation or profit from the racist natures of the British people, or more likely, both.

SupermarketShrimp wrote:He's been banned off Instagram and Facebook now.

He needs the treatment Nick Griffin got. Get him on QT, get him in the mainstream press, show him in the light that he craves and deserves then watch him burn out fizzle and die.

I've watched all of Mr Lennon's videos to get a feel for what he's about. For every Oxford Union address there's 20 occasions where he's used flagrant clickbait and lies to push an agenda.

One of his supporters on Facebook reliably told me that there are huge areas on Manchester that are no go areas to whites.

Amusingly, the areas that he quoted (where the bomber resided) are where I live, and not only that, right next to 2 mosques.

He's made some good points in his errr "career" - however the sheer weight of racist dog whistle bullshit that accompanies it shows me he's either trying to divide the nation or profit from the racist natures of the British people, or more likely, both.

I agree with a number of points you raise , however i cant hold my hand up and say Facebook and Instagram , are the rightful arbiters of what we should and should not hear, and think if it continues this will have a bad ending
https://youtu.be/ja5MrSYq8AQ