Shrimpsvoices

Halstead
Mellor Lavelle Davis Knight-Percival Hendrie
Songo’o Phillips
OSullivan Mendes-Gomes
Stockton

Subs Turner Slew Diagouraga Kenyon Leitch-Smith Pringle Cooney

Ref is Martin Coy....

Text in on 07890851399 and loud n clear...

Hope Carlos is let off the “leash,” as he was in the 2nd half against Sol M. COYS.

5 at the back again, and Kenyon on the bench! Halstead gets his chance as well

looks like 3-5-2 when attacking with the ball

Why not start Kenyon Cooney instead of Songoo Hendrie . Otherwise looking good!

No commentary tonight ?

Can anyone else not hear any commentary? Disappointing

can only get Barrow commentary

Crazeenick wrote:can only get Barrow commentary

Bugger that , sooner do without !

Oh better late than never FM has finally come on [list=][/list]

our commentary on now

Great start, good to see us take advantage when we're on top

Get in there! We've looked really good here. Hoping for a convincing win to put some of our tough games recently behind us.

CARLOOOOOSSSSS!!!!! Yay! GREAT START. Keep it up Shrimps!!!

Doesn't matter now, but looked like a handball by Barra before.

Barrow down to ten men!

I need to see a replay of that, I've got no idea where that red card came from.

Did Hird say something to the ref? Might have been given for abusive language, can't see what else he did wrong

Very harsh that , never a red

Not a sending off. But, as has been said, so many poor decisions have gone against us, this is a balancing up.

Watching it back, I can see why they've given it. If their man handballed it (couldn't see from our angle), then Carlos was through and I can understand a red. We've had enough iffy red cards against us, so I'll take it when one goes for us. Not the howler it looks.

AndyReifman wrote:I need to see a replay of that, I've got no idea where that red card came from.

Watched it twice and wasn't convinced the free kick was ours. The replay was before the red card, so I wasn't looking to see if he was the last man?

Ref/linesman missed a clear handball in the first couple of minutes so they're not covering themselves in glory. Unless it was foul & abusive language, as suggested? Still, nice to go our way for a change.

Good, bright start. Let's get another quite soon.

Swindon under Phil Brown once beat us at home with 10 men after an early sending off.

tim-sanchez wrote:Watching it back, I can see why they've given it. If their man handballed it (couldn't see from our angle), then Carlos was through and I can understand a red. We've had enough iffy red cards against us, so I'll take it when one goes for us. Not the howler it looks.

That's fair enough, but did Carlos push their lad on to the ball?

Keith wrote:

tim-sanchez wrote:Watching it back, I can see why they've given it. If their man handballed it (couldn't see from our angle), then Carlos was through and I can understand a red. We've had enough iffy red cards against us, so I'll take it when one goes for us. Not the howler it looks.

That's fair enough, but did Carlos push their lad on to the ball?

I think it's tricky to see what happens when, whether their lad handles it and then Carlos pushes him, or whether Carlos pushes him into the ball. Probably a better view from the opposite angle. Assuming it's a foul, I think a red is okay, but it's definitely not a blatant foul by any means.