Page 1 of 1

Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:14 am
by Christies Child
On what we've seen to date of Mark, I think it's worth signing the guy on. BUT if it's going to cost us the transfer fee that has been rumoured of of £50K then for me I think it needs to be re-negotiated as it's a lot to pay for him when their is a player at Chester, Paul Rutherford who is proven at this level, is available on a free and is on a number of managers 'wish list'.

Mark showed in the first 35 minutes on Saturday that he's got bags of potential but in todays economic climate ..£50K ???????????

Did anybody else notice that as soon as Duffy swaped wings with Wayne going on the left in the first half, that the Cherries scored their second straight away?

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:51 am
by Keith
Isn't it a 'done deal'? I would be surprised if Southport would let him come to us unless we'd already signed an agreement to purchase him at an agreed price.

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:13 am
by Heysham_Shrimp
Keith wrote:Isn't it a 'done deal'? I would be surprised if Southport would let him come to us unless we'd already signed an agreement to purchase him at an agreed price.



I doubt it will be £50,000 without there being a lot of strings attached to that fee.

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 4:56 pm
by mellow
I can only sense that Christies has just realised sammy has been done up like a kipper.

The deal was done. Price agreed. There is no going back.

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:42 pm
by shrimper
Fair enough. He's looked better and better with each game and has really impressed in his last three when he's started.

Good control, quick and skilful, can spot a pass and has the composure in the box to pick out a colleague when under pressure.

Full-time training seems to have brought him on since his first few glimpses with us.

If the deal is already signed then it's right and proper. He looks very useful, so Southport should rightly get what's due to them, having given him his chance and then been deprived of him midway through their season.

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:00 pm
by RedRedWine1
Southport were looking good for automatic promotion prior to Duffy joining us. Having failed in that sense, £50k in compensation seems nothing in terms of the revenue that promotion to the conference could have brought to them.

He isn't going to avoid the comparisons with Baker. Aside from having similar roles in the side, neither can tackle for toffee. For me this is the area that Duffy needs to improve most in. Hopefully the full-time football league training will help.

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:12 pm
by Aal
Not a patch on Baker I'm afraid...or Wainwright

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:42 pm
by Shrimpman
he never seems to want the ball, unless its passed to him & he hasnt got a choice
last week Barry was trying to release the ball early & Duffy kept putting hid hand up saying "no" i dont want it. he wont run with it ,he always looks for the pass .
how he got motm on saturday was beyond me ,did you hear the crowd cheer?

no i didnt.

Re: Mark Duffy

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:49 pm
by Aal
MOTM on Saturday ought to have been O'Carroll... at least he looked like he was trying.

Shrimpman wrote:he never seems to want the ball, unless its passed to him & he hasnt got a choice
last week Barry was trying to release the ball early & Duffy kept putting hid hand up saying "no" i dont want it. he wont run with it ,he always looks for the pass .
how he got motm on saturday was beyond me ,did you hear the crowd cheer?

no i didnt.