seasonsinthesun wrote:So do you all think it is now going to be a poor season because we have sold Redshaw?
Or do you think we will alter our style of play and it won't make too much difference?
What usually happens in football IMO is that someone often steps up and takes their chance or the team changes their style to suit the players in the squad.
KenH wrote:marky No.1 wrote:Pablo wrote:We are already down by £50K on not having a Stadium sponsor.
Surely it's worth more than that, or do you mean £50k per year? Surely not £50k for a five year term?
seasonsinthesun wrote:So do you all think it is now going to be a poor season because we have sold Redshaw?
Or do you think we will alter our style of play and it won't make too much difference?
What usually happens in football IMO is that someone often steps up and takes their chance or the team changes their style to suit the players in the squad.
P/T Indie wrote:Really CC he only has a year left on his contract and is getting prone to picking up the odd injury so we were never going to get the 250k Peterborough offered.
Are you saying that Jack should be worth more than Carl Baker I'm not so sure, and it's not like he is the leagues top scorer. Anything over 150K for one year left on his contract is more than ok with me.
halftimeresults wrote:Even if we had a cup run/Tv money, we still wouldn't see any of it!...Wolverhampton and Newcastle games netted us over £200000 but did we sign anyone?
In fact we only got a couple of players on loan when it looked like we were going down!
black morse wrote:Not just because it's Jack that's gone but without him and Podge we are definitely short of a goalscorer. Relying on Kev to pull us out again
Christies Child wrote:Absolutely disgusted that we've accepted only £180K for Jack.
Our negotiating skills appear to be questionable what with this deal and the lack of progress on a sponsorship deal for the ground naming rights.
What's the betting that Jimbo is questioning why he allowed Podge to move on this morning.
Jack was always likely to move on sooner rather than later so the Podge move for me was poor.
I just hope that the Board see fit to provide Jim with some finances to go and get a replacement.
I bet the Blackpool Board are laughing this morning.
Bloody terrible.....
heysham_mfc wrote:Christies Child wrote:Absolutely disgusted that we've accepted only £180K for Jack.
Our negotiating skills appear to be questionable what with this deal and the lack of progress on a sponsorship deal for the ground naming rights.
What's the betting that Jimbo is questioning why he allowed Podge to move on this morning.
Jack was always likely to move on sooner rather than later so the Podge move for me was poor.
I just hope that the Board see fit to provide Jim with some finances to go and get a replacement.
I bet the Blackpool Board are laughing this morning.
Bloody terrible.....
Questionable? The club is not financially is a position to be turning deals like this down. Jack will be a big loss but, given the financial state of the club, it was almost certain that Jack would be sold if a good enough offer came in. Wouldn't mind betting also that Jim has already sat down with the board and asked for some of the funds from the deal to be make available to get another couple of players in.
On another note, does anyone know if Alty are due anything as part of the transfer?
heysham_mfc wrote:Christies Child wrote:Absolutely disgusted that we've accepted only £180K for Jack.
Our negotiating skills appear to be questionable what with this deal and the lack of progress on a sponsorship deal for the ground naming rights.
What's the betting that Jimbo is questioning why he allowed Podge to move on this morning.
Jack was always likely to move on sooner rather than later so the Podge move for me was poor.
I just hope that the Board see fit to provide Jim with some finances to go and get a replacement.
I bet the Blackpool Board are laughing this morning.
Bloody terrible.....
Questionable? The club is not financially is a position to be turning deals like this down. Jack will be a big loss but, given the financial state of the club, it was almost certain that Jack would be sold if a good enough offer came in. Wouldn't mind betting also that Jim has already sat down with the board and asked for some of the funds from the deal to be make available to get another couple of players in.
On another note, does anyone know if Alty are due anything as part of the transfer?
Christies Child wrote:heysham_mfc wrote:Christies Child wrote:Absolutely disgusted that we've accepted only £180K for Jack.
Our negotiating skills appear to be questionable what with this deal and the lack of progress on a sponsorship deal for the ground naming rights.
What's the betting that Jimbo is questioning why he allowed Podge to move on this morning.
Jack was always likely to move on sooner rather than later so the Podge move for me was poor.
I just hope that the Board see fit to provide Jim with some finances to go and get a replacement.
I bet the Blackpool Board are laughing this morning.
Bloody terrible.....
Questionable? The club is not financially is a position to be turning deals like this down. Jack will be a big loss but, given the financial state of the club, it was almost certain that Jack would be sold if a good enough offer came in. Wouldn't mind betting also that Jim has already sat down with the board and asked for some of the funds from the deal to be make available to get another couple of players in.
On another note, does anyone know if Alty are due anything as part of the transfer?
..and that is where we differ.
£180,000 is no way near enough for a proven striker when you look at some of the deals that are done.
But the fact is that our poor state of finances (due in part to our inability to get a deal for the Stadium's naming rights sorted) have had a knock on effect in these negotiations in my opinion. I'll go as far as to say that had a deal for The Globe been sorted, Jack would not have been sold for that ridiculous low figure.
.Christies Child wrote:£180,000 is no way near enough for a proven striker when you look at some of the deals that are done.
Christies Child wrote:Absolutely disgusted that we've accepted only £180K for Jack.
Our negotiating skills appear to be questionable what with this deal and the lack of progress on a sponsorship deal for the ground naming rights.
What's the betting that Jimbo is questioning why he allowed Podge to move on this morning.
Jack was always likely to move on sooner rather than later so the Podge move for me was poor.
I just hope that the Board see fit to provide Jim with some finances to go and get a replacement.
I bet the Blackpool Board are laughing this morning.
Bloody terrible.....
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 57 guests