sir jim of bentley

by **seantheshrimp** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:51 pm

Is time running out for jim can we really keep on getting hammered at home

by **black morse** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:07 pm

Considering the great job Jim and Ken have done for us over the years....Keeping us in the league....keeping us away from relegation fights......getting some good players and moving on those that aren't quite good enough, I think this post is rather premature. OK we've got a groundswell of opinion that wants to revert to the free flowing football we had a few games ago but was there any talk of Jim being in danger then? Yes, we've lost our way at present but it's only a month since we were knocking in goals for fun. Give the man a chance! Come back in the New Year and we'll have another look. Oh! and don't tell me this team is going to get relegated if we stick with Jim. It isn't, not this season anyway

by **Mullin4England** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:09 pm

If we have problems spare a thought for the once special one

Chelsea 1 Southampton 3

by **RedRedWine** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:17 pm

Is keeping us in the league but being pampers at home good enough? Yes. Is it sustainable in the long term? Looking at our attendances I'd say probably not.

Overall Jim is doing a good job, so much so that you'd be hard pressed to come up with a list of names that'd do any better.... the only standout candidate is our record goal scorer who works miracles at Stanley but didn't do a good job at Dale.

by **Westgate Wanderer** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:37 pm

Doing a great job conceding 11 goals in three home games! Setting out a team with so many permutations and formations i imagine their heads are spinning before they get on the pitch! Is a simple game, keep it 4-4-2 and just pass to each other and move forward. Occasionally have a shot, occasionally try to tackle an opposing player and perhaps mark a player standing in space on a wing 20 yards away! I know we scored 3 which is great if we knew how to defend! Whatever happens he is our manager for another 2 years after his new contract was awarded recently. So buckle up guys it's going to be a rough ride

by **George Dawes** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:46 pm

new nickname should be (The Tinker Man) like what Chelsea nicknamed Claudio Ranieri.

by **Westgate Wanderer** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:51 pm

Next home game v Crawley.... wonder how many fans will attend as creepy won't bring many! Will make our small budget even smaller!

by **Seasider9601** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:53 pm

Westgate Wanderer wrote:Next home game v Crawley.... wonder how many fans will attend as creepy won't bring many! Will make our small budget even smaller!

Crazy fixture for midweek anyway.

Utter madness on the FL's part.

by **Westgate Wanderer** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:57 pm

I agree it is a stupid fixture but i think we will struggle to get many above a 1,000. Just hope it doesn't rain that night

by **MFC-Manc** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:03 pm

I personally would like to see him stay.

If he was to go though, who would replace him?

by **mrpotatohead** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:07 pm

funny how seatheshrimp seemed to appear round about the time CC vanished,just saying like.

by **mrpotatohead** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:08 pm

Creepy Crawley, freekin hilarious ,last time I heard that Ifell off my Dinosaur I was laughing so much.

by **seantheshrimp** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:17 pm

What are you getting at mr potato head i can assure you im not mr child

by **Seasider9601** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:17 pm

seantheshrimp wrote:Is time running out for jim

No, no, no and no.

by **Westgate Wanderer** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:24 pm

It can't run out he has recently been awarded a 2 year extension of his contract! He's as unsackabe as Wenger and Mourinho!! :shock:

by **Lloydie** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:26 pm

I don't think anyone could do much better, would Fleetwood be looking at Jim though?

by **Westgate Wanderer** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:28 pm

Lloydie wrote:I don't think anyone could do much better, would Fleetwood be looking at Jim though?

by **George Dawes** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:29 pm

mrpotatohead wrote:funny how seatheshrimp seemed to appear round about the time CC vanished,just saying like.

nahhh..

seantheshrimp doesn't start new threads when there's already other one's going on about the same stuff.

by **Kendalshrimp** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:30 pm

Lloydie wrote:I don't think anyone could do much better, would Fleetwood be looking at Jim though?

John Coleman was 12/1 last night, Steve Evans currently 5/6 favourite followed by Steve Thompson an Paul ince. No odds for Jim so highly doubt it !

by **Westgate Wanderer** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:33 pm

Tranmere weren't interested and they are a league lower!

by **George Dawes** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:36 pm

Kendalshrimp wrote:
Lloydie wrote:I don't think anyone could do much better, would Fleetwood be looking at Jim though?

John Coleman was 12/1 last night, Steve Evans currently 5/6 favourite followed by Steve Thompson an Paul ince. No odds for Jim so highly doubt it !

Fleetwood want a Winner, not a Survivor.

by **mrpotatohead** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 8:09 pm

Does anyone happen to know who won the 1998 tour de france?

by **SolentShrimp** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 8:56 pm

mrpotatohead wrote:Does anyone happen to know who won the 1998 tour de france?

Lance Armstrong?
He should he applauded for his many successes while on drugs.
If I was on drugs I'd have trouble findind my bike, never mind winning any world titles!

by **mrpotatohead** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 9:13 pm

I'll have to try something else.

by **red shrimp** » Sun Oct 04, 2015 11:11 am

Jim and Ken seem untouchable, seriously don't see why!!!
Relagation fodder!!

sir jim of bentley

sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Re: sir jim of bentley

Who is online