Full back logic

Full back logic

Postby ezz » Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:28 pm

Yesterday we played Parrish right back and Beels left back which essentially nullified any sort of attacking threat from ourselves down both flanks.
Parrish to be fair has poor distribution and limited attacking ability so playing him right of left back would have made absolutely no difference. His defensive duties would have been the same so for me he should have been left back.
Beels played as a right footed left back which means he needs to cut in every team and limited his delivery on his weaker foot. So basically we had jack shit down either wing. Why didn't he play Beels right back where we could have had some joy down at least one flank without really affecting the defensive back line ( we conceded 4 anyway)

To me Jim made a massive mistake yesterday and the worrying thing is he did nothing to rectify it.
Get over it ;)
ezz
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Morecambe

Re: Full back logic

Postby parceldave » Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:08 pm

Our back four are playing at Arsenal now :o
User avatar
parceldave
 
Posts: 2361
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Full back logic

Postby marky No.1 » Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:22 pm

parceldave wrote:Our back four are playing at Arsenal now :o



Nah, they have let 3 in before 20 minutes is up... Van Gaals filofax will be getting some stick :lol:
Enjoy yourself.... It is later than you think
User avatar
marky No.1
 
Posts: 22233
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Carnforth


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 8 guests

cron