mrpotatohead wrote:Agreed keith, the ripper, the moors murderers and the krays , all ''repented''to some degree in a desperate hope of release, it is somehiw gratifying to see them having a faint glimmer of hope, snuffed out annually after 25 years or so.
SolentShrimp wrote:Can't find where I 've suggested anything like..... whereas you said it was to be expected.
SolentShrimp wrote:Until complete control has been regained then it's possible the violent prisoner's face and teeth came in contact with the solid floor.
SolentShrimp wrote:Were the control & restraint methods used in this case within the permissable rules for control & constraint guidelines in a prison environment?
There has been an enquiry, and the staff concerned have been found to have no case to answer.
Keith wrote:Not commenting on this case...
SolentShrimp wrote:
None of us were there so don't know exactly what went on.
But when a known violent prisoner [I think that includes beheading an innocent victim], begins violently resisting the people who's task it is to escort the violent prisoner from A to B, the violent prisoner usually [I think] has to be physically forced to the floor face down in order to regain complete control.
Until complete control has been regained then it's possible the violent prisoner's face and teeth came in contact with the solid floor. The prison officers have to be in a position of superiority in order for the prisoner to realise he is no longer in control.
The prison officers used force appropriate to the potential violence of a proven violent prisoner, and for their own safety. They've been cleared of any wrong-doing.
SolentShrimp wrote:mrpotatohead wrote:Agreed keith, the ripper, the moors murderers and the krays , all ''repented''to some degree in a desperate hope of release, it is somehiw gratifying to see them having a faint glimmer of hope, snuffed out annually after 25 years or so.
Lee Rigby, his family and friends will take great comfort from that. And also take comfort to know because of his Human Rights his murderer can take the piss out of the system whenever he feels like it. Sick!
Aimee [Lee's fiancé'] is, quite understandably, also reluctant to talk about Lee’s killers. “I don’t think about them. I had a lot of therapy after this happened and the one thing that stuck with me was that if I think about them, if I have any emotions towards them – they’ve won. They haven’t just killed Lee, they’ve killed me as well. And I refuse to let them do that.” When asked if she thinks their sentencing was appropriate, she is silent for a long time. Eventually, she whispers, “Yeah”.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1124551 ... -West.html
“It’s definitely some sort of comfort to know that I’m never going to bump into them in the streets and that they’re never going to be out again," Aimee West said.
[Lee's mother, Lyn said] "I told Lee, 'It's time for you to rest in peace my beautiful son. Justice has been done and sleep well until we meet again,'" Lyn Rigby told The Sun.
"These sentences bring me comfort to know Lee will suffer no more - even though our pain goes on."
SolentShrimp wrote:
Did Lee Rigby have a Human Right to life?
SolentShrimp wrote:Was that Human Right to life brutally taken away from him?
SolentShrimp wrote:Some crimes, this being one, go beyond any further entitlement to Human Rights.
[T]he KGB kidnapped a man they knew to be a close relative of a prominent Hezbollah leader. They then castrated him and sent the severed organs to the Hezbollah official, before dispatching the unfortunate kinsman with a bullet in the brain.
In addition to presenting him with this grisly proof of their seriousness, the KGB operatives also advised the Hezbollah leader that they knew the indentities of other close relatives of his, and that he could expect more such packages if the three Soviet diplomats were not freed immediately.
Soon thereafter, the surviving three hostages were dropped off by the Soviet embassy "from a late-model BMW that couldn't drive away fast enough" and never again was a Soviet (diplomat or otherwise) kidnapped in Lebanon. "This is the way the Soviets operate. They do things - they don't talk. And this is the language the Hezbollah understand." Not only Hezbollah, but ISIS and every other terror group.
George Dawes wrote:can I ask If one of your Family members or loved one's were taken hostage and you seen pictures of them on TV in an Orange boiler suit being threatened to be beheaded etc, would you approve this to get them released?[T]he KGB kidnapped a man they knew to be a close relative of a prominent Hezbollah leader. They then castrated him and sent the severed organs to the Hezbollah official, before dispatching the unfortunate kinsman with a bullet in the brain.
In addition to presenting him with this grisly proof of their seriousness, the KGB operatives also advised the Hezbollah leader that they knew the indentities of other close relatives of his, and that he could expect more such packages if the three Soviet diplomats were not freed immediately.
Soon thereafter, the surviving three hostages were dropped off by the Soviet embassy "from a late-model BMW that couldn't drive away fast enough" and never again was a Soviet (diplomat or otherwise) kidnapped in Lebanon. "This is the way the Soviets operate. They do things - they don't talk. And this is the language the Hezbollah understand." Not only Hezbollah, but ISIS and every other terror group.
shrimpnsave wrote:can you imagine the public outrage when 2 colored murderer's were gunned down on a street in London/the mind boggles!!!
Keith wrote:I was struggling to answer clearly. The closest I can get is, if it was my loved one, would I do that? Yes, anything would be acceptable. If I was in a position of power, making decisions that weren't based upon emotion, then no, it wouldn't be acceptable.
I suppose that would be the case with the death penalty. If someone murdered someone I loved, would I want them to die? Yes, probably. However, that is about 'revenge'. But if you take emotion away, then it shouldn't be about revenge, it is about 'justice'. Society should be looking for justice not revenge.
shrimpnsave wrote:They want more 'ethnic minorities' in the public services so they set 'quotas' - that is they 'positively discriminate' - which means they discriminate against the people they don't want. Yet discrimination is the very thing they consider such a sin.
mrpotatohead wrote:If you need an explanation why 'colored', is considered offensive to black people Shrimpsave ,just ask, but don't ignore Wild Bills poem.
mrpotatohead wrote:Are these somebody elses thoughts and opinions planted in your head solent shrimp, or are you really ignorant, stupid ,and arrogant, bumbling along with a bee in your bonnet without reading other peoples opinions properly, just desperate to have the last word, what a ballbag!
mrpotatohead wrote:Oh dear.It wasn't ignorance, you knew what you meant, so are actually racist then.
mrpotatohead wrote:Oh dear.It wasn't ignorance, you knew what you meant, so are actually racist then.
SolentShrimp wrote:WUM.
I think I have a Human Right to respond.
It's my Human Right to know, and your Human Responsibility to be honest with the facts.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], twosheds and 44 guests