Seasider9601 wrote:Did you hear Jim on Radio Lancs this evening?
The man sweats and bleeds for OUR club.
BACK him.
Seasider9601 wrote:Did you hear Jim on Radio Lancs this evening?
The man sweats and bleeds for OUR club.
BACK him.
Freez wrote:Fair enough, that's your opinion.
We have lost three on the bounce.
Before that we were four unbeaten.
In my opinion, that's not poor enough form to sack anyone.
We have had four managers in 25 years, there have been dark days before in these years but the board have remained sensible and stuck with their man.
The last time we were in a stew we were staring at the drop and we had Sammy in charge throwing daft money at poor players who didn't give a shit.
We took free coaches to Barnet and we won and stayed up, just.
Jim has around roughly half the budget of that season, yet we are still way above then??
It's tough but it's a test for Jim, the players, his back room staff and the fans, as well as the board. Whatever happens, I think results will get better as long as we keep playing like today?
Caged Lion wrote:I listened to Jim talking on Radio Lancs after yesterday's game and there is something he needs to redress because he is wrong.
He suggested that we weren't having much 'luck', and poor refereeing had cost Ellison 4 goals. Ellison is offside far too many times.
Luck is for losers and to factor it into the equation as another reason why we are underperforming is a fallacy.
The teams at the top don't make an allowance for luck. It isn't the reason they are at the top.
Jim needs an experienced assistant who can give him some guidance. Each year it's the same and so far Jim hasn't been able to work out why things fall away during winter.
Keep Jim but replace McKenna with a wiser, league savvy, battle hardened person. There must be dozens of semi retired ex managers who could give Jim some useful direction in how to deal with things when the going gets tough
Morecambe Jack wrote:Forgetting money for one moment (I realise this is very hard for some), this team should be doing better than it is. Compare this squad to the one that finished 4th under Sammy and you could easily argue it is better.
aRealShrimp wrote:The disillusioned individuls on this forum don't deserve Jim bentley. If he were to go, you'd likely be enjoying non league football within 18 months.
This squad you're referring to was built by Bentley and wouldn't be here for long if he wasn't. Be careful what you wish for.
Posh wrote:aRealShrimp wrote:The disillusioned individuls on this forum don't deserve Jim bentley. If he were to go, you'd likely be enjoying non league football within 18 months.
This squad you're referring to was built by Bentley and wouldn't be here for long if he wasn't. Be careful what you wish for.
While I agree.
You should really say a 'few disillusioned individuals'. It is a case of a vocal minority. On a poll on social media 81% of fans back Jim.
The minority shouldn't force Jim out and he's bigger than that. The constant negative atmosphere is pushing fans out.
aRealShrimp wrote:The disillusioned individuls on this forum don't deserve Jim bentley. If he were to go, you'd likely be enjoying non league football within 18 months.
This squad you're referring to was built by Bentley and wouldn't be here for long if he wasn't. Be careful what you wish for.
Posh wrote: While I agree.
You should really say a 'few disillusioned individuals'. It is a case of a vocal minority. On a poll on social media 81% of fans back Jim.
The minority shouldn't force Jim out and he's bigger than that. The constant negative atmosphere is pushing fans out.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 12 guests