BerlinWaller wrote: I have no desire to be a celebrity fan or to be able to show posts on here to my Director friends. I pay my money week in and week out, always have done and always will.
George Dawes wrote:BerlinWaller wrote: I have no desire to be a celebrity fan or to be able to show posts on here to my Director friends. I pay my money week in and week out, always have done and always will.
i know what you mean.
thats whats bugged me over the years, when they go on the defence of anybody speaking out with valid points, like its a crime. they write posts knowing full well Directors and Staff will be reading and that they'll get a big pat on the back of the head come next match day.
and PMG at the recent fans forum as highlighted this
George Dawes wrote:everybody, where all just repeating ourselves with these threads every week.
George Dawes wrote:everybody, where all just repeating ourselves with these threads every week.
George Dawes wrote:everybody, where all just repeating ourselves with these threads every week.
everybody, where all just repeating ourselves with these threads every week.
halftimeresults wrote:feeling it is time for a change doesn't make you a bad supporter.
The Board was wrong to say negative comments on Shrimps voices are damaging the club. People that come on here and say if you don't like it don't come are wrong. This is the place where Morecambe fans get to give their views.
Phil Anderer wrote:I can see PMG and Jim getting upset with some of the comments on here, but people only tend to post negative stuff because they're upset themselves with what's happening to the club. I try not to post too much negative stuff (Prediction League notwithstanding - that's just self-interest ), but there have been odd occasions, most notably the Mansfield home game, where I have posted negative stuff based entirely on what I'm seeing in front of me. By contrast, the next home game (Portsmouth), I chipped in to defend the team against negative comments posted by someone not there, because they were entirely unwarranted given the performance we were putting in. I'll tell it how I see it, and I'll not apologise to anyone, club or SVs, for that (unless I am actually wrong ). As paying customers, we have a right to complain if we think what we're being given is below standard. On that point, I really think we need to attack more rather than sit back and try to defend then snatch a point or win. It patently isn't working, but then as George has already pointed out, we just keep saying the same things and nothing changes. Ho hum...
Phil Anderer wrote:I really think we need to attack more rather than sit back and try to defend then snatch a point or win. It patently isn't working...
Keith wrote:marky No.1 wrote:Tactics of playing not to lose, rather than to win - insufferable to watch
Morecambe weren't much of a threat
Playing not to lose rather than playing to win, or, more to the point, playing tight in the hope of snatching a goal and then defending a 1-0 lead just isn't working. It's crap to watch and it hasn't worked all season. As we're stuffed anyway, why not, just for a change, try something different? Just go for it. Attack, attack, attack. If we get ahead, work to the principle of 'the best form of defence is attack. Who cares if we then concede if we're actually looking to win some games? Pre-season, I had never been so excited about a Morecambe squad, full of skill & flair. It's been throttled out of them, without bringing any success.
Come on Jim, we're unlikely to go down simply because there are two or three even worse sides than us, but if we do, can we at least go down with a little style & attacking endeavour?
The last Morecambe player to score a goal that actually meant we got a point was Baz. *sigh*
Christies Child wrote:Makes me think that Thatcher's saying 'the lady isn't for turning (or was it changing ) could easily apply to Jim and co.
Possibly too set in their collective ways.....
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 20 guests