George Dawes wrote:Strengthens the argument to have regional leagues uptill the championship.
MfcChris wrote:Regional leagues would be the only counter argument. For Plymouth to moan about the fixture list organiser is stupid and built on frustration of traffic.
The reason for North Vs South fixture is clearly the amount of southern teams in League 2. If North v North is kept for Xmas/New Year and early season Tuesday's, then there is not many North v North games that can happen at Easter for 2 games.
Last season was more northern and Easter was Morecambe v Accrington and Bury.
MfcChris wrote:The reason for North Vs South fixture is clearly the amount of southern teams in League 2. If North v North is kept for Xmas/New Year and early season Tuesday's, then there is not many North v North games that can happen at Easter for 2 games.
mrpotatohead wrote:Is it the panels fault Neil?
Christies Child wrote:A question about the fixtures was raised at the. fans forum and I seem to recall the panel replying that the club could do nothing about the dates or timings of the games
George Dawes wrote:If the majority of FL clubs voted for this on what grounds could it be refused?
Setting it up ie, would have to be the furthest 24 clubs north then likewise South you go into, so a team in the midlands could end up in the north? Depending how things stand at the time.
Basically it could be to hard to set up, so thats why its not happend.
outsider wrote:I think the main stumbling block would be, is it league 1 and 2, or league 2 and conference.
John L wrote:outsider wrote:I think the main stumbling block would be, is it league 1 and 2, or league 2 and conference.
Probably League 2 and Conference, as the next level down is already split. I think it's a good idea, especially done that way as it'd still mean we'd be one of the more affluent clubs.
Keith wrote:If League Two merge with Conference, do the league clubs become non-league or non-league clubs become league clubs? Potentially, will Blackpool & Doncaster fancy being in the same league as Solihull Moors & Harrogate Town next season, just to save on travel?
KenH wrote:Better fixture planning isn't rocket science and doesn't need special computer programming. There are only 24 teams!
You start by fixing the "difficult" matches, i.e. set the closer teams together for bank holidays, and the extreme distance teams for Saturdays. Then just randomly match whoever's left for the remaining bulk of Saturdays and Tuesdays.
If you wanted to refine it, you could select the long distance matches in the "nicer" months, i.e. start and end of the season rather than the depths of winter, or you could select closer teams for Tuesdays rather than Saturdays.
This season's fixtures have been incredibly bad - they were bad when they were first announced, and the way the cup matches have fallen, weather, and other postponements have made it even worse.
More thought must have been given in previous years, it can't have been a coincidence that we played the likes of Fleetwood, Accrington, etc on bank holidays! I think Plymouth are right to complain and I hope MFC have made representations too - the way the fixtures have fallen this year have crippled us financially.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests