Keith wrote:First 17 games of the season we scored 34 goals
Then Jim said we were conceding too many.
The next 17 games we scored 19 goals.
First 17 games we conceded 26
Defensive next 17 we conceded 28
I agree, the defence is the problem generally. However, Jim's plan to 'cure' that is to playing defensively. All that happened is we end up deep, inviting pressure on to us. The defines, being under pressure, resort to hoofing it, bypassing midfield. The lone striker is isolated out of the game and we lose possession, so it comes straight back at us.
Time, after time, after time.
Eventually the defence make mistakes and we concede.
Yet Jim stubbornly keeps playing to our weaknesses not our strengths. After Crawley game, when Jim said about conceding, my heart sank and I genuinely thought 'here we go again'. The next 17 games took us up to the Mansfield defeat. If anything, since then we've been even worse.
Carlisle away, we were superb. Great to watch, three points. We could have had more, they just couldn't live with us. Basically the same players here now but relegation fodder. If it hadn't been for the good start, when we were scoring & conceding, we'd be bottom by now.
Now I'm only talking from viewing about 35%-40% of the games, I know, but frankly the attacking football we all craved was essentially turning defence into attack, bypassing midfield and having Barky, Devitt, Miller, etc terrifying defences as a result. The Carlisle game was a game where Carlisle had something to play for so attacked and left holes for it to work. The vast majority of sides have just sat deeper - its exacerbated our weaknesses and nullified the attacking threat.