mrpotatohead wrote:If the sale goes through , I would expect there will be ''new brooms'' in other areas.
Blimey, can we not use the ones we already have, seems a waste to throw them away
mrpotatohead wrote:If the sale goes through , I would expect there will be ''new brooms'' in other areas.
Morecambe Jack wrote:Posh the figures just do not stack up, even someone with limited financial or business acumen can see that it is impossible that the budget has fallen by such levels, unless other wages and salaries have increased dramatically since 2011 - i.e. we are now spending twice as much on hospitality wages. Can that really have happened?
Hypothetically, if the playing budget was 75% of total wages and salaries, if Sammy had a budget then which is 70% higher than Jim's, then other wages and salaries at the club have increased by £430,000 using those factual figures. Do you really believe that is true?
We all know that the budget has been cut but I don't believe that it has been cut by as much as you are suggesting, even if you may have been sold a false one by a director.
I agree the club is in a mess, I agree we can't afford to get rid of Jim, I want Jim to succeed as much as you do. But this is not a meaningless and pointless debate just because it does not suit your agenda. There has been lots of comparisons between this season with Jim and Sammy's last and it is right for me to challenge you on stuff you are saying without real fact or basis.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:I have copies of the accounts that have a detailed P & L Account which may shed more light on the playing budget claims.
The Expense of "Direct Wages - Players Salaries and Expenses" are as follows for the last four years for which accounts have been published including Sammy's last season 2010/2011
Year ended 31 May 2011 £1,185,895 Sammy's last season
Year ended 31 May 2012 £1,169,345 Jim's first season
Year ended 31 May 2013 £1,059,867
Year ended 31 May 2014 £901,543
I believe these figures do not include Social Security costs (Employers N.I.)
These would suggest that the budget has not been slashed as dramatically as some have suggested.
outsider wrote:£284000 + is 1/4 less roughly. So I would say slashed as the cost of living and wages have risen over the last 5 years.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests