admiral47 wrote:I think he was very lucky to inherit such a good team that got us the Wembley- some of his signings have been way off mark and think have put us in trouble. I would not have extended his contract.
campdave wrote:admiral47 wrote:I think he was very lucky to inherit such a good team that got us the Wembley- some of his signings have been way off mark and think have put us in trouble. I would not have extended his contract.
Dunno. I think Adams, Yates, Sorvell and Blinkhorn, all Sammy signings boosted the squad and drove us to the play-offs last year.
Mark S wrote:campdave wrote:admiral47 wrote:I think he was very lucky to inherit such a good team that got us the Wembley- some of his signings have been way off mark and think have put us in trouble. I would not have extended his contract.
Dunno. I think Adams, Yates, Sorvell and Blinkhorn, all Sammy signings boosted the squad and drove us to the play-offs last year.
Ged Brannan? Was he a Sammy signing?
If we are going on the theory of inheriting a good squad, that means either Griff or Leighton James should get the credit for us getting promotion to the Conference?
Howe Magic wrote:shaun garnett never played for the shrimps...maybe some people might be happy if the team won 5-0 every week but sure they would find something to complain about....we have been in league 2 for less than two years and still coming to terms with league football in my opinion...take a look at teams like rochdale been in bottom league for ever - it could be worse scarbrough and boston for example
Howe Magic wrote:we have been in league 2 for less than two years and still coming to terms with league football in my opinion...take a look at teams like rochdale been in bottom league for ever - it could be worse scarbrough and boston for example
matty wrote:Lee Collins - very good when on loan, Terry Mcflynn - can't of been a bad player - look what he's achieved in his time at Sydney - unlucky with an injury and wasn't given the chance he deserved.
Agree 100% with Mark - Griff's team got us out of the Unibond.
ezz wrote:We need morecambe to get bigger, or for some unknown reason a major boost in support. Its not pretty but we have to accept that we'll never really be big enough to progress and sustain our club at a higher level. I know the new stadium is suppose to help with that and im happy the board have gone through with it but in terms of geography and fan base at the moment i think were at our limit, so lets enjoy it.
The Red Knight wrote:Brannan was a Harvey signing and may well have been the last one he made as Morecambe manager. I think he made his debut in the game that Jim had his heart attack.
.
Harry wrote:ezz wrote:We need morecambe to get bigger, or for some unknown reason a major boost in support. Its not pretty but we have to accept that we'll never really be big enough to progress and sustain our club at a higher level. I know the new stadium is suppose to help with that and im happy the board have gone through with it but in terms of geography and fan base at the moment i think were at our limit, so lets enjoy it.
People will come to watch Morecambe if they know they will enjoy thereselves. Not necessarily expecting us to win every game, but knowing they can come and see decent football played with a bit of direction and nous, and when they can see the team is going places on the field. As Sammy himself has said countless times, "It's all good and well having a new stadium planned but not when you'll be playing there in the Conference."
RedRedWine wrote:I agree with some of your points ezz, but I think your looking at the stadium move from the wrong angle. The point in moving from Christie is not to increase crowds significantly, its because the project we are moving to will offer us many more opportunities to generate revenue. The club will not be so heavily reliant on crowds, though they would help and increase the budget available for Sammy to spend on wages even further.
At the moment I think we are treading water until we move stadiums. We couldn't afford to bring in many of Sammy's targets this summer because of the wages they commanded. Sammy is limited as to who he can bring to the club at the moment. If all of the off-field projects are managed correctly when we relocate to Westgate we will have revenue streams up there with most at this level, as the board have indicated. As such, I think it would only be fair to judge Sammy and the transfers he makes when he is operating on more of a level playing field with the majority of clubs at this level.
The embargo we are under at the moment is ridiculous. To me, we are being punished because some clubs at this level seem to get themselves into financial difficulty on a regular basis. As such the FL have stepped in to try and limit the spending of every club. Morecambe, a very well run club over the years, have been caught up in this farce of a rule, whilst the likes of the shandy drinking buffoons at Luton (the sort of club the embargo was brought in to protect, the sort of club that has been in administration more seasons than not over the last decade) are allowed to go and spend a six figure sum on a new player. It does make me both laugh and cry at the same time.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 150 guests