Gnasher wrote:RedRedWine wrote:Some of those directors have recently become more involved again, now that PMG has sold up. We are placing a lot of trust in people like Rod Taylor, that Diego is legit.
PMG sold to Diego, not Rod. The only thing Rod might have to do is help dig the club out of the mire.
RedRedWine wrote:(that's all of them, not just Rod... including the one you sponge free tickets from)
Gnasher wrote:RedRedWine wrote:(that's all of them, not just Rod... including the one you sponge free tickets from)
That's sinking to a new low and you know it. I haven't "sponged" a free ticket since I started voluntary work for the club about 16 years ago, prior to that I didn't watch football. Don't worry, I won't be sinking to your level to reveal anything about you.
Shrimpy wrote:So sale agreed but no money changed hands would suggest that Diego & Abdul are withholding the money for some reason. Are they having second thoughts or are they not happy with the terms of the deal having been involved with the day to day running of the club for a month or so and realised the monumental size of the task at hand?
Posh wrote:Shrimpy wrote:So sale agreed but no money changed hands would suggest that Diego & Abdul are withholding the money for some reason. Are they having second thoughts or are they not happy with the terms of the deal having been involved with the day to day running of the club for a month or so and realised the monumental size of the task at hand?
There's such a thing as an 'escrow' account. Let's say a deal was done but, given there was still due diligence to be done, then the shares swap hands but the money is held in a third-party escrow account controlled by solicitors who release the funds when every element is met.
Let's imagine a situation where a new owner uncovers a raft of problems and that the situation is much worse than they were told then they can withhold funds. If it is particularly bad they could just walk away from the deal and leave it to lawyers, accountants and insolvency practitioners to sort out the mess.
Entirely theoretical of course.
marky No.1 wrote:Posh wrote:Shrimpy wrote:So sale agreed but no money changed hands would suggest that Diego & Abdul are withholding the money for some reason. Are they having second thoughts or are they not happy with the terms of the deal having been involved with the day to day running of the club for a month or so and realised the monumental size of the task at hand?
There's such a thing as an 'escrow' account. Let's say a deal was done but, given there was still due diligence to be done, then the shares swap hands but the money is held in a third-party escrow account controlled by solicitors who release the funds when every element is met.
Let's imagine a situation where a new owner uncovers a raft of problems and that the situation is much worse than they were told then they can withhold funds. If it is particularly bad they could just walk away from the deal and leave it to lawyers, accountants and insolvency practitioners to sort out the mess.
Entirely theoretical of course.
I like playing poker Mike, but I wouldn't enjoy meeting you at the table
3 pints later who knows
Do you think the 'loan' company has done this?
KenH wrote:The move to the Globe and the "corporatisation" has been the catalyst for the current "them and us" situation.
Seasider9601 wrote:KenH wrote:The move to the Globe and the "corporatisation" has been the catalyst for the current "them and us" situation.
Indeed Ken.
Wild Boar Steak anyone?
I've said it all along. Football club, not golf club.
Let's get OUR club back.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 20 guests