fulwoodshrimp wrote:Both on and off the pitch we don't seem to have the organisation and nous required of a football league club and yet nothing seems to change.
fulwoodshrimp wrote:We need a big shake up and we need it now before it is all too late.
Keith wrote:I think we need to give things until January. That will be time to see if cash is forthcoming.
Phil Anderer wrote:I suspect there are still things going on in the background regarding the change of ownership that we know nothing about, and until they're resolved our new owner isn't in a position to do or announce anything drastic. Whether we get the investment and turnaround remains to be seen, and I suspect depends on resolving issues thrown up in the due diligence. Please note this is pure supposition on my part, based on zero insider knowledge, but it still comes down to 'wait and see'. I also think it's unhelpful at this stage to start throwing accusations around, especially at the new owner, when we are not party to the facts.
Christies Child wrote:The silence from the inner corridors of The Globe is both deafening and worrying and doesn't argue well for the clubs future when it was hoped that communication from the Board would have been much more forthcoming. We all understand that certain info has to remain confidential but a clear statement of future intent and a logical explanation of Tom's sudden departure would have been welcome but judging by past events it was always on the cards that the sound of silence would prevail.
Phil Anderer wrote:I also think it's unhelpful at this stage to start throwing accusations around..... when we are not party to the facts.
Lloydie wrote:At the end of the day, the town doesn't deserve a football league team with home crowds heading towards sub 1000 home fans. We should just enjoy league football whilst we can and hope when we fall back into non-league we don't fall too far as the Conference North looks very strong and I think we would struggle to get promoted out of that currently...
Zippy wrote:Re-libel (defamation) it's an interesting little topic that I had a close encounter with a few years back when taking on a multinational before the updated act, good thing is it has some nice meaty defences , bad thing is unlike criminal law , you are assumed culpable until you have gone to the outrageous expense of demonstrating your defence stands in a civil court . Worth while having a read of the below if sailing close to the wind in any public forum.
https://www.lawontheweb.co.uk/legal-hel ... defamation
Phil Anderer wrote:So Morecambe geek &I are still exposed? better edit quick.
Keith wrote:I think we need to give things until January. That will be time to see if cash is forthcoming.
Posh wrote:
The only saving grace is that the land the Globe Arena is built on is in trust and can't be sold,
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 36 guests