Paul Lloyd

by **Christies Child** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:09 pm

Paul has joined Barrow until the end of the season.

by **james456** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:26 pm

Good for him - he can do a job there. I hope Barrow avoid relegation.

by **al1** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:53 pm

lloyd is at workington reds,was on the bench today v wrexham

by **Gnasher** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:13 pm

Paul has joined Workington Reds

Former Morcambe player Paul Lloyd, (21 year old), has signed for the Reds and is available for the FA Trophy tie against Wrexham tomorrow.

Midfielder Lloyd (pictured top left) graduated from the youth-team ranks at Christie Park and was released by Morecambe two weeks ago after they agreed to pay up his contract that expired at the end of the season.

http://workingtonafc.com/news.aspx

by **Christies Child** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:14 am

Oooops my mistake.

Just caught the end of a report on Radio Cumbria and it sounded like the usual Barrow AFC reporter breaking the news.

Sorreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

:oops:

by **nobbyshrimp** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:57 pm

None contract terms

by **nobbyshrimp** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:03 pm

Never made the bench V Wrexham but I notice Darren Kempson did for Wrexham. Didn't know he was only on-loan at Forrest Green!

by **Heysham_Shrimp** » Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:57 pm

Lloyd now signed on for Forest Green surprise surprise !

by **marky No.1** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:15 pm

What's the point telling the world we are Shrimps not Shrimpers when we get it wrong ourselves!
http://www.morecambefc.premiumtv.co.uk/ ... 92,00.html

by **Keith** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:09 pm

I think it's not good when a press release is simply lifted and not proof read before posting :evil:

Referring to ourselves as "they" doesn't look good either.

by **Posh** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:21 am

Keith wrote:I think it's not good when a press release is simply lifted and not proof read before posting Referring to ourselves as "they" doesn't look good either.

I've edited the article now. No excuses but I know for various reasons resources for the site are very scarce but the need to put up articles is still the same. As a result with very little time it's been chucked up without being checked.

by **matty** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:12 pm

Amateurism is amateurism Mr Posh. I think you need to be a bit more committed.

by **Keith** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:29 pm

matty wrote:Amateurism is amateurism Mr Posh. I think you need to be a bit more committed.

I think there have been times when we all thought he should be committed...

by **Posh** » Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:05 pm

matty wrote:Amateurism is amateurism Mr Posh. I think you need to be a bit more committed.

Don't bit, don't bite, don't...

...I didn't post the article I only reacted to Keith's moaning. Don't blame me it wasn't my fault. I only helped by fixing somebody else's effort. Look, that's it I'm never ever going too...

...bite.

by **Keith** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:34 am

Posh wrote:
matty wrote:Amateurism is amateurism Mr Posh. I think you need to be a bit more committed.

Don't bit, don't bite, don't...

...I didn't post the article I only reacted to Keith's moaning. Don't blame me it wasn't my fault. I only helped by fixing somebody else's effort. Look, that's it I'm never ever going too...

...bite.