mrpotatohead wrote:PMG has screwed up his legacy,
I agree.
but I doubt he cares
I disagree.
I suspect that Peter is hurting a lot at the moment. Hurting won't change the mess though
mrpotatohead wrote:PMG has screwed up his legacy,
but I doubt he cares
Gone_Shrimping wrote: Lets hope Rod is top of the list for that.
John L wrote:Well, it SOUNDS promising but, given all the talk about his past, I'll hold my breath...
John L wrote:Well, it SOUNDS promising but, given all the talk about his past, I'll hold my breath...
shrimper wrote:Then Peter (IF ownership would revert to him in the above circumstances) does the sensible thing and offers to hand the whole lot over to a local consortium, made up of existing and possibly previous directors. Maybe taking a smaller amount out himself by way of sale.
Then the people we want in charge continue to run the club. There may also be people out there – locally – who may have been willing to invest previously but not while Peter was wanting whatever he originally wanted for his shares; and certainly not while all this mess was going on.
P/T Indie wrote:The guy does come out with some god ideas but then in the next sentence comes out with something completely daft!
marky No.1 wrote:John L wrote:Well, it SOUNDS promising but, given all the talk about his past, I'll hold my breath...
Not for too long I hope, we are short of fans as it is
halfwayprawn wrote:Are you a trained lifeguard John.
MfcChris wrote:shrimper wrote:Then Peter (IF ownership would revert to him in the above circumstances) does the sensible thing and offers to hand the whole lot over to a local consortium, made up of existing and possibly previous directors. Maybe taking a smaller amount out himself by way of sale.
Then the people we want in charge continue to run the club. There may also be people out there – locally – who may have been willing to invest previously but not while Peter was wanting whatever he originally wanted for his shares; and certainly not while all this mess was going on.
We don't want the current board to continue the mismanagement of the club as they have done for years.
Christies Child wrote:MfcChris wrote:shrimper wrote:Then Peter (IF ownership would revert to him in the above circumstances) does the sensible thing and offers to hand the whole lot over to a local consortium, made up of existing and possibly previous directors. Maybe taking a smaller amount out himself by way of sale.
Then the people we want in charge continue to run the club. There may also be people out there – locally – who may have been willing to invest previously but not while Peter was wanting whatever he originally wanted for his shares; and certainly not while all this mess was going on.
We don't want the current board to continue the mismanagement of the club as they have done for years.
You surely don't include the likes of Rod Taylor in that assessment
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 52 guests