Keith wrote:This is why I was asking about the trust a while ago. I was under the impression that the sale of Christie Park land, as agreed by the trust, was ALL being spent on a new asset for the club/trust. The old 'club' was built upon trust land and it had no value whatsoever. In fact, it had negative value as it needed to be demolished & cleared.
Now, I'm beginning to worry that the trust held one piece of high value land and swapped it for a similar sized (perhaps even less) land that was of low value.
Where did the balance go? If the balance went in to the buildings, then fine, as long as they also belong to the trust. That would mean, if we needed to start again in the North West Counties (or whatever) we would at least have a ground & pitch to play on. In fact, with much lower playing costs, the income from functions in the Wright & Lord would easily cover the cost of the football club on the pitch.
But if we simply own a little bit of land, then somewhere along the line we've been asset stripped.
That's what I'd like to be explained.
sandgrown wrote:
a leading share holder told me at the time of the sale of CP that Sainsburys paid £10M.
then when we moved to the Globe, and someone posted on SV a surveyors web site that showed that the Globe had cost £7.1M.
so a surplus of £2.9M, where that went you make your own mind up !!!!
George Dawes wrote:sandgrown wrote:
a leading share holder told me at the time of the sale of CP that Sainsburys paid £10M.
then when we moved to the Globe, and someone posted on SV a surveyors web site that showed that the Globe had cost £7.1M.
so a surplus of £2.9M, where that went you make your own mind up !!!!
no no, that was me, that's what the ground is valued, not cost of construction, and I'm pretty sure it was 7.6 million.
oh and if you go to globe construction website and look at the projects, and click on Morecambe FC you should find it there, I'm on my phone and can't be messed finding the link.
sandgrown wrote:
a leading share holder told me at the time of the sale of CP that Sainsburys paid £10M.
then when we moved to the Globe, and someone posted on SV a surveyors web site that showed that the Globe had cost £7.1M.
so a surplus of £2.9M, where that went you make your own mind up !!!!
Keith wrote:If that's the case, then it brings us full circle, does the Christie Trust own the Globe Arena? If it does, then I'm less worried about our very existence. If not, then it appears that the Christie Trust was used to pay for an asset that 'someone' could then sell, in which case, we're really screwed and have been getting screwed for a long time.
Just want to know the truth.
Wild Bill wrote:I'd be very surprised if the Christie's Trust covers any more than the grass of the pitch.
marky No.1 wrote:Wild Bill wrote:I'd be very surprised if the Christie's Trust covers any more than the grass of the pitch.
Mr. Cala, in particular, appears to have done his homework, is well informed and can reel off figures without a piece of paper in front of him. (Although I'm not sure about the £100K a month?)
I can't see him going for ownership if he doesn't own the contents of the arena.
The council are quiet on the 'lease' issue
Wild Bill wrote:However, with the economic crisis, the value of the land at CP fell and costs went up with the Globe's construction. This meant directors had to chip in with loans, hence the reason the bits of the land are owned by different people.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 52 guests