NewShrimp wrote:I openly agree that the team spirit is there for everyone to see, but the camaraderie and will to win comes from the players and how they live and interact with each other.
These lads aren't getting paid but play for the man standing next to them on the pitch- no higher friendship/ Camaraderie but for each other- play for badge, the badge is a joke and isn't even paying them!!!!!
Lets be realistic, JC isn't the answer but people need to start getting paid by a realistic owner/ benefactor. Board have done sweet FA other than take us to the brink- time for something different
mrpotatohead wrote:On the subject of short memories.....nobody has forgotten your obsession with getting Jim and Ken out CC. them included!
bill ding wrote:If any players deserve paying its this bunch , god i hope things are sorted shortly they deserve it .
There may not be many supporters there tonight but we will ALL be right behind them !
Gone_Shrimping wrote:bill ding wrote:If any players deserve paying its this bunch , god i hope things are sorted shortly they deserve it .
There may not be many supporters there tonight but we will ALL be right behind them !
Whoever it was that made the decision to pay H.M.R.C. last month rather than pay the players and Globe staff their wages made a big mistake.
fulwoodshrimp wrote:I don't understand Mr Burnard's mentality when he claims he is the owner of the club but doesn't pay the staff. That's not ownership. The sooner he and the leeches hovering around our club depart, the better. We want committed, involved, interested ownership, not people who see our club as an opportunity to make a quick buck.
marky No.1 wrote:fulwoodshrimp wrote:I don't understand Mr Burnard's mentality when he claims he is the owner of the club but doesn't pay the staff. That's not ownership. The sooner he and the leeches hovering around our club depart, the better. We want committed, involved, interested ownership, not people who see our club as an opportunity to make a quick buck.
None of us like this situation, but whatever you think of Burnard and his past, he has (virtually) ended up owning a football club without actually wanting to own one.
Diego passed the EFL test, not him. This leaves Burnard in a position where he is not allowed to pay money (even if he wanted to) because of EFL rules.
hashtag MESS
Christies Child wrote:marky No.1 wrote:fulwoodshrimp wrote:I don't understand Mr Burnard's mentality when he claims he is the owner of the club but doesn't pay the staff. That's not ownership. The sooner he and the leeches hovering around our club depart, the better. We want committed, involved, interested ownership, not people who see our club as an opportunity to make a quick buck.
None of us like this situation, but whatever you think of Burnard and his past, he has (virtually) ended up owning a football club without actually wanting to own one.
Diego passed the EFL test, not him. This leaves Burnard in a position where he is not allowed to pay money (even if he wanted to) because of EFL rules.
hashtag MESS
So it's back to Diego to sort out the finances and get us out of this mess.....
Gone full circle....but how may times is that now....
Gnasher wrote:HMRC would have gone for a winding up order.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Gnasher wrote:HMRC would have gone for a winding up order.
I know , I deal with HMRC on behalf of clients every day of the week.
But assuming we have a decent brief , he would have said at the hearing that the club was in the process of being taken over , then the judgement would have been set aside and put back to a later hearing at which time funds should be available.
By not paying the staff it means that's the club is dependent on the goodwill of the players etc to be able to continue trading.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Redalert1970, Wild Bill and 42 guests