Burnard won

Burnard won

Postby mrpotatohead » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:18 pm

Burnard is the new owner, he won in court
Surprise sex is the best thing to wake up to, unless you're in prison.
User avatar
mrpotatohead
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: circus

Re: Burnard won

Postby Duffman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:25 pm

So the club is owned by a guy that forged his dying father's signature, has been declared bankrupt twice and is currently being investigated for fraud. Phew!

Now for Cala et al. to swoop in and get the club for nothing.
User avatar
Duffman
 
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: Burnard won

Postby Niborian_Shrimp » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:39 pm

Duffman wrote:Now for Cala et al. to swoop in and get the club for nothing.


Maybe not

“I am very pleased to have been advised by my legal team that Mr Burnard stated in open Court there was no agreement with Mr Cala [sic] in respect of the sale of G50s shares and that Mr Burnard has been notified by the Football League that The Football League would not grant their approval for Mr Cala to become the new owner of the Club in any event."


http://www.thebay.co.uk/news/local-news ... -to-court/
Niborian_Shrimp
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:47 am

Re: Burnard won

Postby Duffman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:52 pm

Niborian_Shrimp wrote:
“I am very pleased to have been advised by my legal team that Mr Burnard stated in open Court there was no agreement with Mr Cala [sic] in respect of the sale of G50s shares and that Mr Burnard has been notified by the Football League that The Football League would not grant their approval for Mr Cala to become the new owner of the Club in any event."


http://www.thebay.co.uk/news/local-news ... -to-court/


Cala's group are disputing that comment. Cala does come across as a figure head character and there are far more people involved than we can see. Perhaps Cala will get Mark Dixons old job! :o
User avatar
Duffman
 
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: Burnard won

Postby fulwoodshrimp » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:59 pm

Surely with his indiscretions Mr Burnard will not pass the league's fit and proper person test? His footballing record isn't inspiring. Wasn't he chairman of Bedlington Terriers when they went bust?
fulwoodshrimp
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby Bryan » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:02 pm

Start the Car!!!
Bryan
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:57 am

Re: Burnard won

Postby Gnasher » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:05 pm

Duffman wrote:
Niborian_Shrimp wrote:
“I am very pleased to have been advised by my legal team that Mr Burnard stated in open Court there was no agreement with Mr Cala [sic] in respect of the sale of G50s shares and that Mr Burnard has been notified by the Football League that The Football League would not grant their approval for Mr Cala to become the new owner of the Club in any event."


http://www.thebay.co.uk/news/local-news ... -to-court/


Cala's group are disputing that comment. Cala does come across as a figure head character and there are far more people involved than we can see. Perhaps Cala will get Mark Dixons old job! :o

I have to agree that it would be extraordinary for the EFL to make such a statement about being fit & proper before due processes had been completed. However, hasn't Cala been saying that he was going through that process? Has he already been turned down or was the process put on hold due to the legal situation?
Legally permitted to use "Gnasher" by DC Thomson's lawyers since 1999.
#TooMuchTimeOnMyHands
Gnasher
 
Posts: 2847
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:30 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby Christies Child » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:25 pm

Some how we have to make it clear to Cala that we simply don't want him as owner or for that matter anything to do with our club.

He's caused enough shit in his short stay already and a guy who had to sleep in the club's Boardroom and on a couple of chairs at the Midland suggests he hasn't a bean to his name.

To put it quite simply in words that you may understand....CALA F**K OFF...... :evil: :evil: :evil:

Just hope that Spuds prediction of a Sandgrown'n coming to our rescue proves true... :?: :?: :?:
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: Burnard won

Postby KenH » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:30 pm

According to the Bay radio commentator, it's not settled yet. It's adjourned for another hearing at the end of March. Burnard is still subject to restrictions as for doing anything with the shares.
KenH
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby Christies Child » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:36 pm

Wonder by who and how this months wages and for that matter next months will be paid.... :?: :?: :?:
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: Burnard won

Postby Phil Anderer » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:47 pm

Christies Child wrote:Wonder by who and how this months wages and for that matter next months will be paid.... :?: :?: :?:


Three home games this month should help, as opposed to one last month. I appreciate it's probably not going to pay all the wages, as some are only incurred when matches happen anyway, but it must surely help, especially with the gate against Cambridge to boot. Admittedly Barnet wasn't great and it remains to be seen what we get against Grimsby.
The 3 rules of Fascism:
1. Make stuff up;
2. Scream it loudly;
3. Kill people.
(copyright Eddie Izzard)
User avatar
Phil Anderer
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: Wherever the music takes me

Re: Burnard won

Postby Seasider9601 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:48 pm

As a guide, Grimsby took 750 fans to Crewe last Saturday so we'd be hoping for similar numbers....
Never forget your history
User avatar
Seasider9601
 
Posts: 12657
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:25 pm
Location: LA5

Re: Burnard won

Postby Duffman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:52 pm

Someone associated with Cala has tweeted:

Case has been adjourned for a trial on 29th or 30th March. Thus we are no clearer.
User avatar
Duffman
 
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: Burnard won

Postby Christies Child » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:54 pm

Phil Anderer wrote:
Christies Child wrote:Wonder by who and how this months wages and for that matter next months will be paid.... :?: :?: :?:


Three home games this month should help, as opposed to one last month. I appreciate it's probably not going to pay all the wages, as some are only incurred when matches happen anyway, but it must surely help, especially with the gate against Cambridge to boot. Admittedly Barnet wasn't great and it remains to be seen what we get against Grimsby.


...but we've got some long distance away games involving overnight accom to also fit in.

Doesn't get any easier does it... :cry: :cry: :cry:

Maybe Don C can renew his offer of paying for away travel.... :?: :?: :?:
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: Burnard won

Postby oracle » Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:43 pm

Update on the Bay a few minutes ago.
oracle
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:27 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby Phil Anderer » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:11 pm

Reading the report on the Bay, no one's won yet, and the club's in limbo with the fraud investigation as no responsible buyer would fork out until that's resolved. At least it would seem if Niborian Shrimp's info's right that the EFL has deemed Cala not fit and proper, and he'll hopefully crawl back under his stone.
The 3 rules of Fascism:
1. Make stuff up;
2. Scream it loudly;
3. Kill people.
(copyright Eddie Izzard)
User avatar
Phil Anderer
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: Wherever the music takes me

Re: Burnard won

Postby oracle » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:32 pm

The quotes from the solicitors are worth a listen.
oracle
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:27 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby Christies Child » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Clutching at straws once again, but maybe the new and hopefully reduced asking price for the ownership of our club will encourage someone with empathy with our club...rather than someone who doesn't understand a club and its fan base like ourselves. :?: :?: :?:
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: Burnard won

Postby mrpotatohead » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:48 pm

It also clears up the matter of , ''has Peter been paid''.
Surprise sex is the best thing to wake up to, unless you're in prison.
User avatar
mrpotatohead
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: circus

Re: Burnard won

Postby Gone_Shrimping » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:50 pm

oracle wrote:The quotes from the solicitors are worth a listen.



The solicitor for Mr Burnard said that Abdul has so far put £400,000 into Morecambe F.C.
Gone_Shrimping
 
Posts: 5312
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 7:49 am

Re: Burnard won

Postby Wild Bill » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:48 pm

Gone_Shrimping wrote:
oracle wrote:The quotes from the solicitors are worth a listen.



The solicitor for Mr Burnard said that Abdul has so far put £400,000 into Morecambe F.C.


If this is true it shows how much cash we are hemorrhaging ;)
Wild Bill
 
Posts: 3013
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:21 am

Re: Burnard won

Postby KenH » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:57 pm

Wild Bill wrote:
Gone_Shrimping wrote:
oracle wrote:The quotes from the solicitors are worth a listen.



The solicitor for Mr Burnard said that Abdul has so far put £400,000 into Morecambe F.C.


If this is true it shows how much cash we are hemorrhaging ;)


The public accounts show it all. The average losses for the last few years have been £600k - that's how much cash we've been losing - every year! It's been made up of selling assets (land - none left now!), taking out loans/overdrafts from the banks and by the directors (particularly PMG) putting in money.

This season, it seems that it's been Abdul putting it in rather than PMG!
KenH
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby KenH » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:59 pm

£1,000 for company formation/set up - that's pretty steep - even the top 4 firms of chartered accountants don't charge anywhere near that!

Also begs the question as to why/how a guy from Qatar decides to buy a football club in the UK and seemingly randomly chooses an unqualified one-man band accountant from County Derham to form it?

None of this makes any sense at all.
KenH
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby fulwoodshrimp » Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:15 pm

I agree KenH. None of this saga makes sense. I still believe there is a lot more to this story than we have been told. Something fishy has gone on and now the police are involved it is possible some improper behaviour will be highlighted. I hope it doesn't taint our beloved club even more.
fulwoodshrimp
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: Burnard won

Postby Wild Bill » Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:38 pm

So are things now becoming clearer?

Diego was the front guy for Abdul and his money
Burnard formed G50 to allow Diego and Abdul to buy MFC
Something went wrong with with Diego and Abdul. Abdul tried to back out
Diego did a runner, Abdul left with the financial burden of MFC
Diego's shares transferred to Burnard, who now becomes the new Diego (front man for Abdul)
Diego contests the transfer, but really hasn't got a leg to stand on or indeed a pot to piss in
If (and most likely when) Burnard and Abdul win the court case, MFC will be back up for sale
Joseph Cala might come back into play :(
Wild Bill
 
Posts: 3013
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:21 am

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Keith and 33 guests