mrpotatohead wrote:It also clears up the matter of , ''has Peter been paid''.
Posh wrote:The Shrimps Trust had its own representative in court today. Hopefully he'll be in a position to comment later on matters. In all this I can't understand why Abdulrahman isn't the owner, given he seems to have funded the original deal and the club since? I intended to be there but got stuck on a train and then had a meeting at 11.30. However, by the sounds of it the show will be back on again soon with plenty more performances along the way.
mrpotatohead wrote:Abdul seems the lesser of 4 evils again? wow ,how confusing,past and present directors gripe about being unable to comment, and being unfairly judged simple answer......comment, tell the real people that matter the truth, the people that dont care about ''money'', the long suffering supporters!
Christies Child wrote:mrpotatohead wrote:Abdul seems the lesser of 4 evils again? wow ,how confusing,past and present directors gripe about being unable to comment, and being unfairly judged simple answer......comment, tell the real people that matter the truth, the people that dont care about ''money'', the long suffering supporters!
Maybe it would be a lot more enlightening if you actually took the trouble to talk directly to PMcG about the entire saga.....you might be surprised as to what he really thinks and what he tells you....
Phil Anderer wrote:Christies Child wrote:Wonder by who and how this months wages and for that matter next months will be paid....
Three home games this month should help, as opposed to one last month. I appreciate it's probably not going to pay all the wages, as some are only incurred when matches happen anyway, but it must surely help, especially with the gate against Cambridge to boot. Admittedly Barnet wasn't great and it remains to be seen what we get against Grimsby.
mrpotatohead wrote:Yeah Neil, they are all a bunch of ladyparts!
Christies Child wrote:mrpotatohead wrote:Yeah Neil, they are all a bunch of ladyparts!
Sounds to me as though some don't have the man parts to talk face to face to the ladyparts as you refer to 'em....or should that be one ladypart in particular
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Keith and 35 guests