Wild Bill wrote:Wasn't there a promise last summer to build something in time for the new season, only for it never to materialise?
Wild Bill wrote:Wasn't there a promise last summer to build something in time for the new season, only for it never to materialise?
Westgate Wanderer wrote:I thought Mr T mentioned this in another thread last week. Starting that is taking longer than anticipated but plans are in the pipeline!
George Dawes wrote:I'm not name dropping, it's breaking confidence.
But I can't understand why when fans are willing to fund this or raise funds the club are putting obstacles in the way.
1) CCTV
2) it's ok, where on to it, it's getting sorted.
Basically the Club is Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth, they don't have to pay a penny, let's make it happen!
NPL Daze wrote:George Dawes wrote:I'm not name dropping, it's breaking confidence.
But I can't understand why when fans are willing to fund this or raise funds the club are putting obstacles in the way.
1) CCTV
2) it's ok, where on to it, it's getting sorted.
Basically the Club is Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth, they don't have to pay a penny, let's make it happen!
Didn't I have the misfortune to read something about this situation on Facebook over the weekend?
Rod Taylor gave the answers as to what the current state of play is
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Wild Bill wrote:Wasn't there a promise last summer to build something in time for the new season, only for it never to materialise?
Yes , I suspect the directors have been busy finding cash for the wages so this is likely to remain on the back burner until or if a new investor/owner arrives.
Heysham_red wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:Wild Bill wrote:Wasn't there a promise last summer to build something in time for the new season, only for it never to materialise?
Yes , I suspect the directors have been busy finding cash for the wages so this is likely to remain on the back burner until or if a new investor/owner arrives.
Great idea, then we will lose even more fans due to false promises and uttlerly shambolic communication. When is this board going to learn.
Christies Child wrote:What's more important....a cover at the rear of The Omega OR funding the club to guarantee we have a team to support.....
Christies Child wrote:What's more important....a cover at the rear of The Omega OR funding the club to guarantee we have a team to support.....
Heysham_red wrote:Christies Child wrote:What's more important....a cover at the rear of The Omega OR funding the club to guarantee we have a team to support.....
Why don’t you ask the fans who don’t come any more what’s more important? My attendance over the last 5 years has decline simply because the value for money is pants and there has been little attempt to reconnect with the fans. We are no longer a family club. We are simply a badly ran business. Sad times. II would take the north stand and conference football over what we have everyday.
You carry on pretending everything is ok though.
As for getting the trust to pay for everything. I wouldn’t pay for a bus pass then pay extra to get the bus. Why do we seem to think it’s ok to do that for a football club.
Phil Anderer wrote:Heysham_red wrote:Christies Child wrote:What's more important....a cover at the rear of The Omega OR funding the club to guarantee we have a team to support.....
Why don’t you ask the fans who don’t come any more what’s more important? My attendance over the last 5 years has decline simply because the value for money is pants and there has been little attempt to reconnect with the fans. We are no longer a family club. We are simply a badly ran business. Sad times. II would take the north stand and conference football over what we have everyday.
You carry on pretending everything is ok though.
As for getting the trust to pay for everything. I wouldn’t pay for a bus pass then pay extra to get the bus. Why do we seem to think it’s ok to do that for a football club.
Any chance you could point to the post where CC (or anyone, for that matter) says everything's OK? I don't think anyone thinks that, but I find it bizarre that anyone could think providing cover behind the home end (which I'm not dismissing, BTW, I think it should have been there from the off) is more important than ensuring people get paid at the end of the month.
Christies Child wrote: Maybe those who have little respect for those charged with continuing to finance our club should show a bit of gratitude ...after all without the continued financing of our club by a select few, there would be no MFC operating in the EFL.
Christies Child wrote:It's not often that I take exception to a post about me, but Heysham red is so off the mark when he claims that I pretend that everything is OK when it clearly is not BUT I try to remain positive and trust that things will work out fine for our club sooner rather than later.
There are too many gloom merchants posting on SVs including a few who for whatever reason like to stick the boot in which at times reads like they have personal vendettas towards certain Board members.
I'm critical of Jim and his style pf play but respect him for his loyalty and commitment to our great club and would never sink to the depths of wishing him anything other than the best at all times. Maybe those who have little respect for those charged with continuing to finance our club should show a bit of gratitude ...after all without the continued financing of our club by a select few, there would be no MFC operating in the EFL.
Rant over....
NPL Daze wrote:1) There is no money
2) The future of the club is uncertain
3) The club is for sale
4) Other priorities are more pressing.
5) We are operating on by far the smallest budget in the EFL.
Anything else ??
NPL Daze wrote:1) There is no money
2) The future of the club is uncertain
3) The club is for sale
4) Other priorities are more pressing.
5) We are operating on by far the smallest budget in the EFL.
Anything else ??
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 31 guests