Knightrider wrote:Redevelopment of Christie was progressing already.
There were even plans drawn up and presented to build a new stand and hospitality area etc on the Car Wash side...!!
Knightrider wrote:Redevelopment of Christie was progressing already.
Knightrider wrote:redrobo wrote:I assume your are referring to the move from CP to The Globe? From questions that I raised at a shareholders meeting regarding the cost of redeveloping CP it became clear that that was a non starter due to the financial cost involved and also the well intentioned move to a new purpose built stadium was seen as a progressive move by the Board. However subsequent financial happenings on a global scale affected the original plans that resulted in a far from perfect stadium that the Board have acknowledged on numerous occasions.
As for investment in the team, the new owners have cleared the outstanding debts and increased the managers budget we are told. Whether you believe that or not is up to you and others but although their silence is of concern maybe that is the way that our new owners prefer to do business. Maybe in the coming weeks their actions will show that they are in it for the long haul and not to asset strip as is the believe of some. After all the club has the safety valve of the Christie Trust to ensure survival of the ground at the very least.
Nonesense
There is no evidence so far that the new owners have given Jimbo a budget to purchase a top quality goal scoring striker or a creative midfielder.
Redevelopment of Christie was progressing already. How much was spent on the beloved North stand?
The decision to move ground was not supported by the majority of long time loyal fans who had legit concerns which proved to be correct but sadly were ignored.
redrobo wrote:
Where is the evidence to prove that?
mrpotatohead wrote:I think everyone at the time realised we had to move to progress, we could not afford to develop Chrisie park without the Sainsbury's money, and 3 sides of the ground were no good for the football league anyway , it's what we ended up with that people are unhappy about, a fantastic amount of money has been mispent and we don't even own what we are left with.
fulwoodshrimp wrote:Did we get 12 million for Christie Park? I thought at the meet the new owners meeting PMG disputed the figure.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:fulwoodshrimp wrote:Did we get 12 million for Christie Park? I thought at the meet the new owners meeting PMG disputed the figure.
I think the sale of Christie Park was in the region of £8 million..
a fantastic amount of money has been mispent and we don't even own what we are left with.
marky No.1 wrote:
Missed out on a humongous grant as we chose not to go all seater
Andy D wrote:marky No.1 wrote:
Missed out on a humongous grant as we chose not to go all seater
I seem to recall MFC wanted seating(future proof) but our Fans were banging on about replicating the old North Stand saying standing creates a better atmosphere, so the that why that decision was made.
parceldave wrote:Andy D wrote:marky No.1 wrote:
Missed out on a humongous grant as we chose not to go all seater
I seem to recall MFC wanted seating(future proof) but our Fans were banging on about replicating the old North Stand saying standing creates a better atmosphere, so the that why that decision was made.
If they had brought the not so old North Stand round it may have been a better atmosphere .
marky No.1 wrote:Threw a lot of money at a lot of has been players from a catalogue, who often just sat in the stand and thought they were better than us
Seasider9601 wrote:marky No.1 wrote:Threw a lot of money at a lot of has been players from a catalogue, who often just sat in the stand and thought they were better than us
Chris Shuker for one..........
"I had a bit of a bad time mentally in the game with a few things that happened at Tranmere and then I went to Morecambe, where I didn't enjoy it. The training was poor and I basically spent my time thinking that I didn't want to be there. It wasn't a confidence issue with me it was more to do with the training and being unfit because of it. It was a bit of a bad 18 months for me. Players who don't have your ability, but who want it more, become better than you so I had to sort that out. They wanted it more than me there because that was where they loved playing and basically I didn't want to be at the club. That wasn't down to ability – if I wanted to I could turn it on. We did the same thing every day – playing 15-a-side games on a postage stamp. Touching the ball was like murder, and playing on a mud bath every single day was terrible."
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Seasider9601 wrote:marky No.1 wrote:Threw a lot of money at a lot of has been players from a catalogue, who often just sat in the stand and thought they were better than us
Chris Shuker for one..........
"I had a bit of a bad time mentally in the game with a few things that happened at Tranmere and then I went to Morecambe, where I didn't enjoy it. The training was poor and I basically spent my time thinking that I didn't want to be there. It wasn't a confidence issue with me it was more to do with the training and being unfit because of it. It was a bit of a bad 18 months for me. Players who don't have your ability, but who want it more, become better than you so I had to sort that out. They wanted it more than me there because that was where they loved playing and basically I didn't want to be at the club. That wasn't down to ability – if I wanted to I could turn it on. We did the same thing every day – playing 15-a-side games on a postage stamp. Touching the ball was like murder, and playing on a mud bath every single day was terrible."
Shuker was a shit player and so as Capaldi !
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Naylz and 33 guests