redrobo wrote:Just thought it's time to have some thoughts away from football.....
If it was you or I we'd be prosecuted for not wearing a seat belt when driving. Should the Duke of E be different....
Admin can delete this thread if they wish. No problem as I'm probably on my way to the Tower...
Doonhamer wrote:Sorry popcorn. According to news reports Phil the Greek was seen on a road near to the entrance to the Sandringham estate so therefor on a public highway and not in the estate. You owe someone an apology and would you like cream with your humble pie ?
Popcorn wrote:redrobo wrote:Just thought it's time to have some thoughts away from football.....
If it was you or I we'd be prosecuted for not wearing a seat belt when driving. Should the Duke of E be different....
Admin can delete this thread if they wish. No problem as I'm probably on my way to the Tower...
Check the law before you post crap like this. If you drove around Sandringham as he did, the police could do no more to you than they have him. Private property, you could break the land speed record and get no more than a stiff telling off.
Doonhamer wrote:Sorry popcorn. According to news reports Phil the Greek was seen on a road near to the entrance to the Sandringham estate so therefor on a public highway and not in the estate. You owe someone an apology and would you like cream with your humble pie ?
mrpotatohead wrote:popcorn owes RR an apology
Doonhamer wrote:Try looking at the bbc, sky news, itv, cnn any newspaper you care to read. Is that enough. I am not saying he has been treated differently than you or I as all police officers have the power of discretion but shall we say some get more discretion than others. The previous post is correct. The monarch and only the monarch is above the law as they are the law that’s why princess Anne was convicted some time ago for what I think were driving offences
Doonhamer wrote:Popcorn what do you base your argument on. Are you a lawyer for the crown prosecution service a barrister a judge or police officer.
Doonhamer wrote:Irrelevant I am asking you what you based your discussion on.
redrobo wrote:Now now folks not worth a slanging match. My question was based on media reports and photographs taken on entry to the royal estate. Not sure if it was private road or not.
Good to have a topic for disagreement on other than football.
Popcorn wrote:redrobo wrote:Now now folks not worth a slanging match. My question was based on media reports and photographs taken on entry to the royal estate. Not sure if it was private road or not.
Good to have a topic for disagreement on other than football.
Your post wasn't a question, very unusual for you but it was a statement. On what is your statement based?
"If it was you or I we'd be prosecuted for not wearing a seat belt when driving."
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 31 guests