Post match interview

[Slanester]

I don’t know about you fellas, but for me, with things as they are, for the next, very important game:

I don’t care what team Jim starts with.
I don’t care what team Jim ends with.
I don’t care how we play.
I don’t care what Jim has to say in the post match interveiw, as long as it includes reference to The Shrimps getting 3 pts.

A win at this time would be massive to the team, and equally the supporters.

but will he go for a win, or his usual clean sheet ?

I will be there on Sat sg, and I tell you staight. If Jim starts with a defensive line up, the football we play is dire, substitutions questionable etc, etc......as long as we win, to be boring, I don’t care. I will clap my hands raw. For me, that’s how important I feel it is to get 3pts against Vale.
Obviously, that’s not a theory I would like to apply as the norm for every game...well maybe a couple

[HALMA 1983]

You have to aim for a 'clean sheet' in order that you give yourself the best possible chance of winning a game, by keeping one you most certainly can't lose

If you aim for a clean sheet, then concede, and struggle to score, then you lose.

Jim Harvey style 'if you score two, we'll score three' can still result in defeat, but at least then it's entertaining!

Better still do it the Coleman way, you score 10 and we'll kick you off the park and get 11