redrobo wrote:Just a pity that the money we spend on loaned youngsters couldn't have been spent on a wee bit of experience such as a certain player at Blackpool who isn't in contention for their first team squad...and is looking to be loaned out.
Anyone any idea who pays the wages of loanees or does it depend on the club loaning the player out as part of the deal....
Keith wrote:redrobo wrote:Just a pity that the money we spend on loaned youngsters couldn't have been spent on a wee bit of experience such as a certain player at Blackpool who isn't in contention for their first team squad...and is looking to be loaned out.
Anyone any idea who pays the wages of loanees or does it depend on the club loaning the player out as part of the deal....
You aren't comparing apples with apples. You aren't even comparing apples with pears. You're comparing apples with Pot Noodles!
A certain 'currently out of favour' Blackpool player would cost far more than a development 19 year old from a Premiership team. Also a 'currently out of favour' Blackpool player may not even be available for a loan deal and may still be a back-up League One player. I suspect Tanner is going to be a back up player for us too, but will get some 'real' experience over the season. A 'currently out of favour' League One midfielder would expect to play whenever available & fit.
Bare bum wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=2AxgoKkZnYU
Could be an exciting addition
redrobo wrote:What I like about him is his close marking and getting stuck in. Non of this backing off that we see too often. Hopefully he will get a chance to show his prowess and be allowed to play to his strengths and natural ability.
Close marking of an opponent is some thing that we rarely see from our lads.
black morse wrote:redrobo wrote:What I like about him is his close marking and getting stuck in. Non of this backing off that we see too often. Hopefully he will get a chance to show his prowess and be allowed to play to his strengths and natural ability.
Close marking of an opponent is some thing that we rarely see from our lads.
Perhaps that's because Jim prefers them to play that way.
glagys wrote:See he got a booking, but apart from that how did he do
Slanester wrote:glagys wrote:See he got a booking, but apart from that how did he do
The lad was very good last night. He played a very mature game, especially considering his age. To be honest, the clips in the YouTube video are a good representation. He looks strong, confident, hard,accurate tackling, good positioning, passed the ball well, quick, and definitely not out of his depth. Think we have another “good un.”
BerlinWaller wrote:Looks a very good footballer. Carried the ball and looked to play forward when he had it. He looked a threat when played at Wing back. I thought it was a wasted substitution unless he had a knock.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 44 guests