Redalert1970 wrote:Bit disrespectful. Are Jason and Colin not the two guys who saved the club !!!
P/T Indie wrote:What will be telling is if they suddenly back the new manager in January. If they do it will show they were just making life difficult for Jim.
OLDHAMADE wrote:Sheridan might be on their radar and he's a relegation specialist
Redalert1970 wrote:Bit disrespectful. Are Jason and Colin not the two guys who saved the club !!!
Redalert1970 wrote:Bit disrespectful. Are Jason and Colin not the two guys who saved the club !!!
Seasider9601 wrote:Redalert1970 wrote:Bit disrespectful. Are Jason and Colin not the two guys who saved the club !!!
Why is it disrespectful ?
What have they done for us since, apart from drive away the biggest hero the club has EVER had...??
We never hear anything from them. They are shrouded in mystery. I don't trust them.
One of them voted on a "Fans" ( ) Facebook page to sack Jim Bentley, yet later claimed he didn't.
BerlinWaller wrote:Seasider9601 wrote:Redalert1970 wrote:Bit disrespectful. Are Jason and Colin not the two guys who saved the club !!!
Why is it disrespectful ?
What have they done for us since, apart from drive away the biggest hero the club has EVER had...??
We never hear anything from them. They are shrouded in mystery. I don't trust them.
One of them voted on a "Fans" ( ) Facebook page to sack Jim Bentley, yet later claimed he didn't.
Ask yourself, where would we be without them?
marky No.1 wrote:Well, they have certainly done something.
They have cleared our debt that nobody else wanted to do and have paid off 2 years of losses, around £1.2M ?
It's what comes next that is the issue
marky No.1 wrote:It's what comes next that is the issue
Seasider9601 wrote:marky No.1 wrote:It's what comes next that is the issue
Exactly Mark.
Seasider9601 wrote:So you've no concerns about their lack of communication, lack of investment, failure to back Jim, voting in a dodgy online poll, ever louder rumours about them wanting the land etc etc ?
Seasider9601 wrote:So you've no concerns about their lack of communication, lack of investment, failure to back Jim, voting in a dodgy online poll, ever louder rumours about them wanting the land etc etc ?
Duffman wrote:Seasider9601 wrote:So you've no concerns about their lack of communication, lack of investment, failure to back Jim, voting in a dodgy online poll, ever louder rumours about them wanting the land etc etc ?
Lack of communication from the club can go back to the Christie Park days, way before the current owners were involved.
Lack of investment (depending on where you believe investments should be made) will always be an issue being one of the smallest clubs with the smallest attendances in the league.
Failure to back Jim? No one with any sense would offer Jim an extension whilst bottom of the table.
The land issue has been done hasn't it? With it being part of a trust it's untouchable?
Yes, the Facebook poll was completely stupid and unforgiveable but whether you like them or not, without the new owners Jim might have left 18 months ago and club might not still be in the football league.
Duffman wrote:[
The land issue has been done hasn't it? With it being part of a trust it's untouchable?
Keith wrote:Duffman wrote:[
The land issue has been done hasn't it? With it being part of a trust it's untouchable?
A large amount of it is not in trust, so plenty to sell & build on if the club ceases to exist.
Morecambe Jack wrote:Keith wrote:Duffman wrote:[
The land issue has been done hasn't it? With it being part of a trust it's untouchable?
A large amount of it is not in trust, so plenty to sell & build on if the club ceases to exist.
Misleading. The integral parts i.e. ground and access road are in the Trust, so no issues there. All other land isn't owned by the Club whether it exists or not (other than the gravel car park), so the Club or its owners have no control over that either.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests