thedoc wrote:Thanks for the kind words. I've tried repeatedly to get a link to this article on Barrow's Facebook page. All you get is a `will get back to you' message - but they don't. Any ideas anyone?
Freez wrote:Barrow and Workington and to some extent Southport were all voted out purely on Geography. It bloody stunk.
Freez wrote:Barrow and Workington and to some extent Southport were all voted out purely on Geography. It bloody stunk. Southport had been promoted from Div 4 only three seasons before they were voted out. Div 4 had a few southern teams and getting to Torquay was ok for them but trekking up north was deemed expensive, hence all three voted out. The method we have now is far far superior and it always tickles me that the first to take advantage were Scarborough, which is a bugger to get to even for us!!
Gone_Shrimping wrote:Although it seems unfair on Barrow , Workington and Southport , were there any occasions when any of them finished in the bottom 2 but were then reprieved by the voting system ?
Keith wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:Although it seems unfair on Barrow , Workington and Southport , were there any occasions when any of them finished in the bottom 2 but were then reprieved by the voting system ?
I don't think Barrow ever finished I the bottom two. Don't know about the others.
Morecambe applied to join the Football League on a few occasions and were rejected.
Keith wrote:Gone_Shrimping wrote:Although it seems unfair on Barrow , Workington and Southport , were there any occasions when any of them finished in the bottom 2 but were then reprieved by the voting system ?
I don't think Barrow ever finished I the bottom two. Don't know about the others.
Morecambe applied to join the Football League on a few occasions and were rejected.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 52 guests