Are We Going Back, 2

by **Freez** » Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:44 pm

To be fair, Hyndburn is still dragging Lancs down, and we in this area have had a spike in the past few days to take us above 100 per 100,000, and I think there in lies the problem.
The government were not willing to differentiate last time out, I would be surprised if it’s different this time but it might be a pleasant surprise.
Royal Preston still has over 100 patients with COVID so that’s another factor unfortunately.

Will this post be removed?

by **BerlinWaller** » Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:53 pm

Freez wrote:To be fair, Hyndburn is still dragging Lancs down, and we in this area have had a spike in the past few days to take us above 100 per 100,000, and I think there in lies the problem.
The government were not willing to differentiate last time out, I would be surprised if it’s different this time but it might be a pleasant surprise.
Royal Preston still has over 100 patients with COVID so that’s another factor unfortunately.

Will this post be removed?

No it won't be, you're in the gang!
:shock:

by **Freez** » Wed Dec 16, 2020 9:16 pm

Haha, is that so? Paranoid bollocks, I’m afraid. No gang, never has been apart from in the small minds of some, but don’t let that stop you, the truth doesn’t usually.

We move on.

I was wondering if the lack of fans and our good form at home is perhaps connected?
I hope not, our tactics have been at times quite conciliatory but the results have come. Pity no crowds as perhaps the myth of Fortress Christie and we never lost their could be dispelled once and for all? Just a thought.

by **Wild Bill** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:46 am

No let ups from the joys of tier 3 I am afraid :cry:

by **jbc.shrimp** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:06 pm

Have they mentioned when the next assessment is yet ? I personally think it should be done from local level.

by **black morse** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:09 pm

Very difficult to operate from local level. If Lancaster were in 3 and Morecambe in 2 the Lancaster lot would just come to Morecambe to drink.

by **Keith** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:32 pm

BerlinWaller wrote:What has changed? I pass the testing site in Lancaster countless times a week and it is always empty. How a Labour MP can withdraw her support to help getting people back in to work is beyond me.

Will this post be deleted?

Perhaps she knew that COVID-19 levels had increased by 11% despite you being in Level 3 already and she felt it would be futile at best, or even irresponsible to argue to reduce restrictions while levels are still increasing?

Will this post be deleted?

by **tim-sanchez** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:03 pm

I'm losing track of who's in what tier, will there be fans at Colchester?

by **parceldave** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:16 pm

Keith wrote:
BerlinWaller wrote:What has changed? I pass the testing site in Lancaster countless times a week and it is always empty. How a Labour MP can withdraw her support to help getting people back in to work is beyond me.

Will this post be deleted?

Perhaps she knew that COVID-19 levels had increased by 11% despite you being in Level 3 already and she felt it would be futile at best, or even irresponsible to argue to reduce restrictions while levels are still increasing?

Will this post be deleted?

No you're in the gang

by **Keith** » Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:23 pm

parceldave wrote:
Keith wrote:
Will this post be deleted?

No you're in the gang

Ah, okay. I'm not sure whose posts do get deleted?

by **captain sparkle** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:27 am

Just what's going on in Bare? up to Dec 14th-
An interactive Government map formed using the latest coronavirus data shows the Bare suburb of Morecambe currently has the hyper local highest infection rate in Lancashire.A total of 42 cases were recorded in the seven days to December 14 giving it an infection rate of 801.7

by **redrobo** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:52 am

captain sparkle wrote:Just what's going on in Bare? up to Dec 14th-
An interactive Government map formed using the latest coronavirus data shows the Bare suburb of Morecambe currently has the hyper local highest infection rate in Lancashire.A total of 42 cases were recorded in the seven days to December 14 giving it an infection rate of 801.7

Could it be that the area has a lot of elderly people as well as Care Homes for the chronically sick as well as the elderly..... :?:

My mum was resident of Eric Morecambe House for 10 years and it did / does a superb job in caring for the elderly but the virus has no respect for the standard of care in such places and I'm sure that Care Homes have suffered probably more than any other establishments.

:cry:

by **Lonesome Prawn** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:57 am

The area shown on the map isn’t very densely populated, but does have a significant number of care homes. Presumably it can only be cases among residents of these care homes that’s skewing the stats.

by **black morse** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 1:01 pm

Old people raves in Happy Mount Park? :shock:

by **redrobo** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 1:22 pm

black morse wrote:Old people raves in Happy Mount Park?

Plenty of children parties for you to enjoy..... :lol:

by **Sakhalin Shrimp** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 1:52 pm

Lonesome Prawn wrote:The area shown on the map isn’t very densely populated, but does have a significant number of care homes. Presumably it can only be cases among residents of these care homes that’s skewing the stats.

Is it possible to post a link to the map please?

by **Screenster** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 1:57 pm

Sakhalin Shrimp wrote:
Lonesome Prawn wrote:The area shown on the map isn’t very densely populated, but does have a significant number of care homes. Presumably it can only be cases among residents of these care homes that’s skewing the stats.

Is it possible to post a link to the map please?

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/interactive-map

by **black morse** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 2:20 pm

redrobo wrote:
black morse wrote:Old people raves in Happy Mount Park?

Plenty of children parties for you to enjoy.....

Think I'm older than you RR :lol:

by **Phil Anderer** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 3:45 pm

Looking at that map Redrobo and I should be about as worried as those in Bare, although looking in more detail there are only 34 cases, it's just the low population density means high proportion of cases. Again it could be down to care homes, although Mrs A's mum's home is clear as far as we're aware.

by **Sakhalin Shrimp** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 5:26 pm

Screenster wrote:
Sakhalin Shrimp wrote:
Lonesome Prawn wrote:The area shown on the map isn’t very densely populated, but does have a significant number of care homes. Presumably it can only be cases among residents of these care homes that’s skewing the stats.

Is it possible to post a link to the map please?

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/interactive-map

Thanks Screenster, I had done a search but couldn’t find the site

by **redrobo** » Mon Dec 21, 2020 6:01 pm

black morse wrote:
redrobo wrote:
black morse wrote:Old people raves in Happy Mount Park?

Plenty of children parties for you to enjoy.....

Think I'm older than you RR

You MUST be old then..... :lol:

by **Wild Bill** » Wed Dec 23, 2020 7:21 am

Sadly I know of a care home that currently has infections.

Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Re: Are We Going Back, 2

Who is online