parkyboy wrote:Dave Artell appointed mgr of Crewe
John L wrote:Scott Davies and Cole Stockton start for Tranmere at Chester this evening on BT Sport, with Jim Harvey punditerating!
Lurchy wrote:Garry Worrall came into our work the other day. He is managing director of a goal equipment company. He said he played 5 games for us in the 80s after what sounds a fairly successful career else where
KenH wrote:Barky scored another 2 for Preston yesterday. 4 in 3 consecutive games now.
glagys wrote:Hope we had a sell on clause on barks ???
KenH wrote:glagys wrote:Hope we had a sell on clause on barks ???
Doesn't sound like it. In Jim's post match interview after Newport he was talking about the loss of "our best player" Barky and that the people handling the sale "should have got a better deal". I wonder which of our directors was handling the sale at that time? It's unlike Jim to be critical like that, but if we really didn't get much for him and didn't get a sell on clause, it must be a kick in the teeth after Jim/Ken found Barky and propelled him upwards.
KenH wrote:glagys wrote:Hope we had a sell on clause on barks ???
Doesn't sound like it. In Jim's post match interview after Newport he was talking about the loss of "our best player" Barky and that the people handling the sale "should have got a better deal". I wonder which of our directors was handling the sale at that time? It's unlike Jim to be critical like that, but if we really didn't get much for him and didn't get a sell on clause, it must be a kick in the teeth after Jim/Ken found Barky and propelled him upwards.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:KenH wrote:glagys wrote:Hope we had a sell on clause on barks ???
Doesn't sound like it. In Jim's post match interview after Newport he was talking about the loss of "our best player" Barky and that the people handling the sale "should have got a better deal". I wonder which of our directors was handling the sale at that time? It's unlike Jim to be critical like that, but if we really didn't get much for him and didn't get a sell on clause, it must be a kick in the teeth after Jim/Ken found Barky and propelled him upwards.
Wasn't it done when everyone thought that Diego was the top banana ?
KenH wrote:glagys wrote:Hope we had a sell on clause on barks ???
Doesn't sound like it. In Jim's post match interview after Newport he was talking about the loss of "our best player" Barky and that the people handling the sale "should have got a better deal". I wonder which of our directors was handling the sale at that time? It's unlike Jim to be critical like that, but if we really didn't get much for him and didn't get a sell on clause, it must be a kick in the teeth after Jim/Ken found Barky and propelled him upwards.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], captain sparkle, Google [Bot] and 11 guests