BerlinWaller wrote:Has there ever been a more disengaged fanbase than ours in a situation like this?
shrimpsontoast wrote:Exactly what point(s) would your joint demonstration be proposing to make OMK?
black morse wrote:How long is it since a club AGM? Thought we had to have one every year!
Billy bodger wrote:There are so many Morecambe Fans when you read their blogs on this website that can not be labelled as disengaged and like Phil I find it somewhat offensive to be labeled in that way. We just want to do things differently and through this website maybe just maybe a way of getting action against JW might start to take shape.
As I have stated Owners of clubs have to be fit and proper people to run a football club and the LFA have a ten point test.
As Black morse has suggested is there anyone with any information that might be useful to bring to the attention of the LFA, where JW fails one or more of those tests.
My understanding is that the LFA can then put an administrator in charge of the sale of the club. JW would still be the owner but it would mean it is the administrators who can accept any bids. I would think the administrators would not value the club anywhere near JW’s valuation and JW would have to take the offer accepted by the administrators.
The sticking point of the sale of the club is JW’s valuation which has by all accounts have been met by potential buyers walking away. This is one of the reasons for the board’s statement at the back end of last year.
The accounts will have to be settled soon so they will be Intrested reading.
Billy bodger wrote:Where we are fixated with JW, is it actually the Bond Group that own the majority shares in Morecambe FC and if so is Colin Goldring still a co-owner of the Bond Group?
Seasider9601 wrote:I thought it was legal Neil and had to happen I must admit.
Not heard anything for a few years now in that regard.
Is it (as I think) a Legal requirement @gone_shrimping ??
shrimpsontoast wrote:I’m not the person to do it and I wouldn’t want to suggest that anyone else in particular is well placed to do it, but it seems to me that fans on here (including myself) could benefit from a thorough education on (a) company law including the duties and powers of shareholders and directors and (b) the duties and powers of the EFL.
Perhaps if that was well understood by all, people could begin to have a constructive and well informed discussion about next steps and their likely impact on the club.
KenH wrote: Is that actually happening?? Perhaps a shareholder could confirm.
Seasider9601 wrote:KenH wrote: Is that actually happening?? Perhaps a shareholder could confirm.
Nope. Not received anything at all Ken for a good few years now.
shrimpsontoast wrote:I’m not the person to do it and I wouldn’t want to suggest that anyone else in particular is well placed to do it, but it seems to me that fans on here (including myself) could benefit from a thorough education on (a) company law including the duties and powers of shareholders and directors and (b) the duties and powers of the EFL.
Perhaps if that was well understood by all, people could begin to have a constructive and well informed discussion about next steps and their likely impact on the club.
BB I’m almost certain that what you say about the fit and proper test and the supposed power of the EFL to instigate a club sale if an existing owner were to subsequently fail the test is not correct.
black morse wrote:EFL have urged the owner of Reading to either fund the club correctly or sell it.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 105 guests