BerlinWaller wrote:The club say that they can not comment due to legal reasons so not sure how people know who the buyer is.
redrobo wrote:BerlinWaller wrote:The club say that they can not comment due to legal reasons so not sure how people know who the buyer is.
What legal justification is there for our BoDs not to say that as they know it at the moment that NO sale has been agreed by Jason....
However IF a sale has been agreed and the BoDs know who the proposed buyer is then to disclose his / her / their name(s) would be in breach of any legal reasons currently in place.
captain sparkle wrote:If it's 'illegal' to say who the prospective buyer is,
surely it can't be illegal to say who the prospective buyer ISN'T?
captain sparkle wrote:If it's 'illegal' to say who the prospective buyer is,
surely it can't be illegal to say who the prospective buyer ISN'T?
Phoenix Shrimp 2017 wrote:The useful information I take amongst a myriad of crap and guesswork is a statement from a very well connected Freez. Minimal but to the effect that something is with the EFL but it doesn’t involve Sarbjot. Certain in the know individuals seem to have a handle on events behind the scenes but obviously ain’t going to broadcast it from the rooftops just yet.
BerlinWaller wrote:Don't get excited about the not being Sarbjot bit. Clearly the people behind the bid have been trying to find the best person to pass any EFL test and we know that Sarbjot was never going to be able to.
redrobo wrote:BUT to get basically a Proxy Director to pass the fit and proper test is a possible outcome with the the Proxy Director only in place for 3 months when he or she will opt out leaving Sarjot in complete control.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 92 guests