redrobo wrote:There may be a tendency with such groups to become little more than a talking shop. Now not for a single minute am I suggesting that our Trust has or may fall into that category but I would like to see a wee bit more visual evidence of an action performed by the Trust.
Nothing substantial and nothing of significant cost but a few posts ago I suggested that the front of the Maz was looking a bit tired and to improve its visual appearance the Trust could organize a small working part one Sunday to undertake some painting of doors and other areas that have started to look their age.
The cost of paint is not that substantial and I'm more than willing to provide some finance towards its purchase.
The Trust are rightly doing their utmost to assist in any way it can to secure a purchase of our club despite the lack of communication from the current owner. And by the communication from the Trust to date they have certainly raised the profile of any sale and good on them.
But a simple task as suggested above is a way to provide visual evidence to the entire Shrimps family of its importance to OUR club as it moves forward to a brighter future hopefully under a new and more committed owner than the current incumbent.
Hodgie1978 wrote:Which email did you use?
They've changed them
dazza wrote:but am i the only person not really understanding what the trust are actually bringing
im honestly not trying to belittle it but im struggling to see what can be achieved here
Keith wrote:dazza wrote:but am i the only person not really understanding what the trust are actually bringing
im honestly not trying to belittle it but im struggling to see what can be achieved here
What do you think the Trust should be doing, but aren't?
Wild Bill wrote:I think the trust really is doing what it can and seems to be getting more organised and better at communicating. Like others have said though, it really needs more members and more volunteers to take it to the next level. If every regular fan joined, it would have some serious leverage with any owner of the club.
vvm wrote:They're not that bad and since the new board has been elected things seem to have improved. Communication for one has improved massively.
I think the latest update indicated around 600-700 members. £10 a head that's only a £6000-£7000 budget for the year. That won't go that far if it's not spent wisely.
Hodgie1978 wrote:Should the unthinkable happen. We are in a totally different position to what Bury found themselves in.
I honestly do not believe we'd fall as far down the ladder with what our Trust has put in place.
dazza wrote:Someone else mentions a fighting fund ? To fund what ? A takeover bid. Let’s be realistic that’s not happening ,if the board have no say I’m sure a trust has no say in the short term future
Keith wrote:Totally agree that a take-over bid is entirely unrealistic, and the fund is not for that purpose. However, if we go under, then we need to be ready, to ensure we're able to continue at some level.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 100 guests